Comparing heads shapes, faces and hair colour is 19th century science and I can see that 19th century science does not seem to be a problem on this thread.
So let me post specific references from 19th century "science". The following is a summary of racist trash mistakenly called "science"
Initially, afterSanskrit was "discovered" by Europeans they believed that "Aryams" must have originated in India. This is what Huxley wrote in 1890
European "scientists" did not like this ONE BIT. How could such marvelous knowledge start among blackies? And yes, North Indians were als considered black and inferior.
Huxley wrote: (linke below)
A man called Latham came up (around 1850 I think) with the Sarmatian Hypothesis that suggested that Aryans must have come from Russia - as has been suggested on this thread 164 years after Latham. That is not 21st century science. It is 19th century theory. Here is a screen grab of the relevant part of Latham's Sarmatian Hypothesis
Aldous Huxley was not totally happy with the Sarmatian hypothesis. he believed that the purest race were blonds and therefore he added to the Sarmatian hypothesis saying that Aryans originated in Sweden and were blonds
Some excerpts:
The Aryan Question (1890)
I think these theories are laughable bullshit. read tha long ppaper by Aldous Huxley and you can have your fill of why people look the way they do using 19th century nonsensical methodology. If one chooses to call this sciece - that is fine with me, but I stil think it's laughable trash.
Those who wish to believe it are welcome to do that - I am not setting out to change anyone's mind. I know what I know and I know what I believe.
Sorry to have interrupted. Please lets have some more pretty girlie pics and call it science.