BTW as per this new Armenian/Iranian hypothesis they aren't sure when and through which route Indo-Iranian entered India.
But as per Narsimanh around 6000bce this CHG like IranN ancestry entered North West India. But contrary to this Reich in many video's is claiming II entered through steppe route post 2000bce.
These guys are so confused.
What do you make of it?
You already know how avestan was created from VEDA ki Bhrigu Agnirasa Samihta.
Only the last known Veda : ATHARVA VEDA is contemporaneous with Avesta.
See there are 2 types of Indologists who have published works on Itihas of BHARAT.
The first is those authors who have based their writings on archaeological and or genetic evidence and act as objective. These include names as Richard Meadow, Jean F Jarrige, Gregory Possehl, Kenneth Kennedy, Bridget Allchin, Jonathan Kenoyer (Most famous SINDHU SARASVATI archaeologiest I consider him only next to BB LAL and NICHOLAS KAZANAS other being KOENRAAD) , Lorenzo Costantini , Sandor Bokonyi, Paul Rissman , David Harris , C . Petrie , Peter Underhill, Stephen Oppenheimer , M.Mele etc etc etc. Also that littaeur and crauwel to some extent.
Then there is shitlectual masturbationists who do not follow evidence but create larps and fantasy flingings out of their own fried meth ridden brains on the basis of pre existing prejudices about BHARAT's magnificient Itihas. Coomers take help of spurious citations. Wild non existent hypotheses followed with next hypotheses followed by next hypotheses everytime they get stuck to keep the chooran running. In this category you can put coomer davidreich, fuller, kavita gangal, asko poopola, that wendy run d etc.