skywatcher
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2020
- Messages
- 1,954
- Likes
- 838

Is this relevant?
It's relevant, but unfortunately doesn't show us the homeland of PIE
We are all true inheritors of SSVC - the north simply has more admixture through the historic times mixing ( Shaka, Parthava, Tukhara, Yeopthal, Turushka, etc. migrations from 100s BCE-600s CE period)Telugu Brahmins & Telugu Sat-shudras...true inheritors of SSVC
Bhumihar ain't Brahmans,brahmans in bihar and eastern up are a separate community than bhumihars.and i don't think that the genetic distancing for any of the caste mentioned is that much to make a diff.Telugu Brahmins & Telugu Sat-shudras...true inheritors of SSVC
The tribes you're mentioning as foreigners themselves were once among the rig Vedic tribe,the only difference bw a north indian and a South Indian is the admixture with more AASI, genetically their ain't much difference(other than that of isolated tribes),phenotypically maybe..We are all true inheritors of SSVC - the north simply has more admixture through the historic times mixing ( Shaka, Parthava, Tukhara, Yeopthal, Turushka, etc. migrations from 100s BCE-600s CE period)
IMO, these may've been rigvedic tribes, these are the names given to the foreigners who returned to India much later, after the R1 haplotype arose or after admixture with the west asian J haplotypes, introducing the steppe DNA in the 100s BCE-600s CE period.The tribes you're mentioning as foreigners themselves were once among the rig Vedic tribe,the only difference bw a north indian and a South Indian is the admixture with more AASI, genetically their ain't much difference(other than that of isolated tribes),phenotypically maybe..
Out of India.....but the people who migrated out were not Aryans, but Dasyus,the ancestors of ZooropeansDid Aryans migrated out of India or was India invaded by Aryans??
R1A1 admixture is very old,nearly all(from tribes to endogamous castes) have R1A1 admixture and in healthy amount so this whole shit is a big mess than we generally generalise.IMO, these may've been rigvedic tribes, these are the names given to the foreigners who returned to India much later, after the R1 haplotype arose or after admixture with the west asian J haplotypes, introducing the steppe DNA in the 100s BCE-600s CE period.
R1A is not the Aryan genetic marker, IranN/IndiaN is the Aryan genetic markerR1A1 admixture is very old,nearly all(from tribes to endogamous castes) have R1A1 admixture and in healthy amount so this whole shit is a big mess than we generally generalise.
No one here is buying this AIT bs....all the efforts in this thread are to debunk the AIT & prove OIT....we are adding more & more evidence in favour of OIT & against AITWhy do we keep subscribing to the western theory of Aryan invasion. It is their way of explaining superiority of Indian mind and philosophy over their war like mind stuff.
No sir, nobody came from Eurasia. They were all Indians with sophisticated cultural background who were forced to migrate to Gangetic valley from the Sarswati River banks due to drying of the river or natural calamities.
Hence every time you talk about Aryan Invasion theory, you give credibility to the Western view point.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
N | lets talk about, Aryan invasion/Migrantion | History & Culture | 1 | |
![]() |
Aryan Invasion Theory. Do you approve? | Subcontinent & Central Asia | 2 | |
![]() |
Indo-Aryans vs Iranians | History & Culture | 5 | |
P | European Misappropriation of Sanskrit led to the Aryan Race Theory | History & Culture | 1 |