Abhinandan?? Remember what the COAS had said to his father over the phone after his capture?? You think he would have shown the same level of concern and efforts to extricate him if the good pilot belonged from a more humble origin??They will never send thier kids , will they ?
While any concrete data is not available in the public domain, frontally at least, the armor should provide an adequate level of protection if the round impacts a portion covered by the armor that is. The problem with Arjun's design is that it's riddled with several weak spots of sizable proportions within the frontal hemisphere in its turret as well as the hull and if a round impact anywhere in those areas, then the tank will be in big trouble.What is Protection of Arjun mk1 Against APFDS
And HEAT rounds
Is there Data available
I had them but deleted them long time back , some docs might still be available if Google searched.What is Protection of Arjun mk1 Against APFSDS
And HEAT rounds
Is there Data available
I think it was a 3BM42M Mango out of a 2A46M 125mm L/52 gun of a T-72M1 that was defeated, which is of 80's vintage technology by the way.I had them .
Anyways older kanchan armour defeated Israeli APFSDS rounds at point blank range. The scientists and army officers were so surprised they had to double check if the Israelis were supplying training rounds as APFSDS rounds. Turned out it was genuine APFSDS round.
T-90 is superb designed tankIn a war sacrifice is necessary... we may build the best tank but soldiers will die.
Problem with Indian tanks is neither they are economically sound nor provide ample protection or user friendly.
We are just flushing our money on substandard designs and imports. The tech develop for arjun itself can help us build tanks better than T-90s we import. The situation is same everywhere whether tanks artillery rifles or even Tejas.
If it wasn't for some one like Manohar Parrikar who definitely interfered to improve on with mk2 variant and naval version etc we would have been left with a substandard Tejas forced on IAF.
Arjun project needs to be shelved right away and the tech developed so far be used to upgrade T-90s and T 72s
The focus should be on FMBT.
Decent 450 -500 mmI think it was a 3BM42M Mango out of a 2A46M 125mm L/52 gun of a T-72M1 that was defeated, which is of 80's vintage technology by the way.
Actually, I know for sure it was a Mango, with a pathetic L: D ratio of 15:1. I was just being modest but some folks simply do not deserve our modesty it appears.What you think is different matter . Anyone can think what he and she wants.
Your words are not the Gospel, amigo.I specifically said Israeli APFSDS rounds and that's it .
I deleted my post when I realised it was you who posted it. You are the person who abused family. You are that sort of person who is best avoided.Actually, I know for sure it was a Mango, with a pathetic L: D ratio of 15:1. I was just being modest but some folks simply do not deserve our modesty it appears.
Your words are not the Gospel, amigo.
Against the armor technology of that era, yes. But against new marks of Burlington armor, its DOP will likely be a lot lower.Decent 450 -500 mm
Only if the Kontact V ERA tiles work as intended. Problem is, modern NATO and US rounds have been designed in such a way that either they wouldn't set off the ERA or can simply breakaway its tip upon detonation of the ERA while the rest of the penetrator goes straight through without its trajectory being disrupted. That's why I (and @Bleh ) have been advocating the replacement of K5 derivatives in our service with something like the Duplet/Nozh or Malachit.T-90s has 850mm against APFSDS
Quite possible, the sections which are covered by the armor at least. But the rest (like that oversized mantlet and behind Gunner's Primary Sight or the lower front plate) is quite thin.I think Arjun mk2 has btw 850- 900mm
With NERA
Dude, I can be and do even worse...............a lot fucking worse in the real world if you catch my drift.I deleted my post when I realised it was you who posted it. You are the person who abused family. You are that sort of person who is best avoided.
If you can't handle the heat, then do us all a favor and get the fuck off the internet, grandpa!! Or if possible, the fucking planet.Don't quote my post ever again
@LurkerBabaDude, I can be and do even worse in real life if you catch my drift.
If you can't handle the heat, then do us all a favor and get the fuck off the internet, grandpa!! Or if possible, get off the fucking planet.
What happened, couldn't handle it by yourself?? Had to run crying to your mommies with your tail between your hind limbs, grandpa??
@LurkerBabaWhat happened, couldn't handle it by yourself?? Had to run crying to your mommies with your tail between your hind limbs, grandpa??
@LurkerBabaHmmm... so added another one of your mommies to the list?? Achievement unlocked - CRYBABY!! Well fucking done, good sir.
This FMBT contract by IA is a charade to stall Arjun,In a war sacrifice is necessary... we may build the best tank but soldiers will die.
Problem with Indian tanks is neither they are economically sound nor provide ample protection or user friendly.
We are just flushing our money on substandard designs and imports. The tech develop for arjun itself can help us build tanks better than T-90s we import. The situation is same everywhere whether tanks artillery rifles or even Tejas.
If it wasn't for some one like Manohar Parrikar who definitely interfered to improve on with mk2 variant and naval version etc we would have been left with a substandard Tejas forced on IAF.
Arjun project needs to be shelved right away and the tech developed so far be used to upgrade T-90s and T 72s
The focus should be on FMBT.
It has everything to make mince meat of Chinese tanks.Really, do Arjun1A have a good APFSDS?
MK2 is good enough for Abrams?
With the present ammo? Not likely, unless the Arjun can get them from the flanks.It has everything to make mince meat of Chinese tanks.
Just mount the autoloader in the turret bustle as the South Koreans and the French did.Tanks with auto loaders hv limits on the length of Tungsten rod , (since auto loader has a length limitation on APFDS rounds)
T90 etc are basically two piece ammo types with an upper limit on the crucial APFDS rounds,
world over with increase in composite armor tech , we need new rounds with higher penetration for killing enemy tank.
for this we need single piece ammo(which is mostly available with manual loading tanks) Because we can increase the length of APFDS rounds by increasing the length of Tungsten rod in the round,
Thats the reason IA gave 4 men manual loading spec for Arjun. SO that newer Ammo can be developed and deployed with higher penetration.
But IN FMBT contest , no such spec is specified, and everything is purposely left vague,
That reminds me of a saying, You never go far , when you dont know where you are going"
I mean FMBT is road to nowhere , since IA doesnt know where it wants to Go