Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT)

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,041
That is MK-1, Arjun MK-2 engine is uprated and output is 1500hp..

Cannot say about NERA but very possible as hybrid Armour was ready long back....
 

ersakthivel

Brilliance
New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,764
Country flag
You are so ecited with a photo of Arjun Mk1 and a very poor drawing... entertaining indeed. :)
not as entertaining as your very informative post like the monkey export version of T-72 is inferior to true blue soviet version which had a thicker armour while debating that heavier more weighing armoured tanks not neccasarily more protective of the crew.
 

ersakthivel

Brilliance
New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,764
Country flag
The DRDO's Pune-based Composites Research Centre (CRC) and the Research and Development Establishment, Engineers [R & D E(E)], have developed multi-layered multi-functional fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite hull/turret sub-structures at much lower weights in comparison with metallic counterparts.

More than 40 per cent weight savings over steel hull structures have been achieved. Also developed for the Arjun Mk2 is co-cured composites integral armour (CIA), which comprises ceramic tiles and rubber sandwiched between two FRP composites layers. While the outer FRP composite layer acts as a cover and provides confinement, the ceramic layer provides primary protection against ballistic impact, and the inner FRP composite layer acts as the structural part as well as secondary energy absorbing mechanism. The rubber layer isolates stiff and brittle ceramic tiles from structural member.

The CVRDE, with IMI's help, has also redesigned the Arjun Mk1's turret to incorporate modular sloped armour fittings, and has developed a slat-armour package to protect the MBT against anti-tank rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) attacks. It functions by placing a rigid barrier around the vehicle, which causes the shaped-charge warhead to explode at a relatively safe distance.

For protecting the Arjun Mk2 against tandem-charge RPGs and guided anti-tank missiles, the CVRDE and IMI have co-developed a lightweight non-energetic reactive armour (NERA) package, comprising tiles in which two metal plates sandwich an inert liner, such as rubber. When struck by a shaped-charge's metal jet, some of the impact energy is dissipated into the inert liner layer, and the resulting high-pressure causes a localised bending or bulging of the plates in the area of the impact. As the plates bulge, the point of jet impact shifts with the plate-bulging, increasing the effective thickness of the armour.


The Arjun Mk2's turret has not been drastically redesigned and all it now sports is the kind of sloped frontal and side modular armour panels of the kind seen on the Leopard 2A6. The turret design of the Mk1 had vulnerability issues with regard to 125mm The max and cross-country speeds of the Mk2 will be the same as that of the Mk1.
Found on a website. it said weight reduction is being achieved, but at the same time reports say the mk-2 weighs 3 to 4 tons more.
So the point to be cleared is whether the mk-2 tanks that are being tested in rajasthan are fully engineered mk-2 ?
or
just mk-1s being updated with mk-2 improvements and serving as a test bed?

so arjun mk-2 has side armor panel on turret to protect it from sideways hit.
If any one has info on this please post.
 
Last edited:

ersakthivel

Brilliance
New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,764
Country flag
finally some good sense is prevailing.It is nice to see that the IA is realizing that no one is going to give a futuristic FMBT to india ,specially adopted to indian conditions on a platter.That was the approach consistently articulated by the israeli experts.They openly said ,Tank design is iterative for the FMBT india must improve over the arjun design instead of going for a bran new platform.

Now after seing the arjun doing perfectly well ,it seems army has realized the virtues of homegrown tech over imports.Especially after the nuclear deal with george bush led US government sanctions and tech denials are a thing of past. We can have tech co operation with any western firm for further deelopment of indigenous models.SO this is the right way to go.

In a 2008 seminar, organized by the DGMF, Israeli Major General Yossi Ben-Hanan --- an acclaimed tank designer who fathered Israel's successful Merkava tank --- told an attentive audience that tank design is evolutionary, each design building upon the previous one. The Israelis began designing their Merkava Mark-1 MBT in 1970; today they have the world class Merkava Mark-4.
 
Last edited:

ersakthivel

Brilliance
New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,764
Country flag
Broadsword: Army proposes to scrap Future Main Battle Tank: instead build successive models of the Arjun
the following comment in the above link busts another long held myth that arjun is an inefficiently designed overweight tank due to the inexperience of CVRDE.

This DGMF decision not to develop an FMBT stems from the difficulty it faced in drawing up specifications for the new tank. A key hurdle was in reconciling the need for a four-man tank crew (like the Arjun, and unlike Russian tanks that have a three-man crew) with the simultaneous wish for a lighter tank that weighed not more than 50-tonnes. The 60-tonne-plus Arjun has been criticised as too heavy.

Says a key general: "All contemporary three-man-crew tanks weigh 50-tonnes, like those being built by South Korea, Turkey and Japan. Adding a fourth crew member also adds roughly 10-tonnes of weight, due to increase in the tank size and weight of armour. But we were asking for a 50-tonne FMBT that would have a four-man crew. It just didn't add up."
 

sayareakd

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,953
Country flag
with Russian FMBT cancelled by Putin, IA had already running out of options. I posted long ago that DRDO has last laugh in this.
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
with Russian FMBT cancelled by Putin, IA had already running out of options. I posted long ago that DRDO has last laugh in this.
This is confusing.

Putin did not cancel

Armata UCP program. It is going as scheduled and is perhaps already into construction phase.

India's FMBT program is different and according to Ajai Shukla's article, it won't be taking off.

An Arjun Mk3/Mk4 will definitely be more successful than a new FMBT project, this is obvious. But I would prefer that the army stick to the decision once made, or else they will end up importing the Armata because somehow the Russians invented a 4th gen tank.
 

navkapu

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2010
Messages
62
Likes
39
Country flag
There is a arms lobby lots of kickbacks for these projects to become reality it would be a huge task for DRDO ........ will it happen ?
 

Abhi9

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2012
Messages
562
Likes
1,582
Country flag
Will see that in time, Presently what we know about MK-2 is very impressive and superior to other competing tanks from Russia..
Well with our stuck up defence minister i am sure that army and lobbyist cannot have their way that easy
 

militarysta

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
2,110
Likes
789
Cannot say about NERA
But I can say smth. about NERA generally. It's loooks like german invention orginally but now NERA/ NxRA in and out of the armour looks like very important part of the armour.

Couple pictures taken from pdfs:
simple German single NERA layer vs HEAT (SC) warhed:



part of propably the best pdf about NERA avaible in the net:


Double NERA layer (placed like in Leopard-2A5-A7 "wedges" turret armour) raduce RHA perforation from 950mm RHA to only 14-81mm (!)
Of course whole idea is to protect against double HEAT (SC) warhed.

Compare russian ERA I and II generation, whit russian NERA and russian SLERA. The laast- German NERA to compare.





NERA pannels o Str.122 (Leo2A5) Hull:
 

Articles

Top