Damian
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 4,836
- Likes
- 2,202
No such vehicle designed yet. I can point out several designs that after modifications can be such:@Damian which is perfect tank in your mind ??? present day.
1) M1A2SEP, after several modifications it can be perfect MBT in classic design.
2) T-84M Oplot-M (Ukr. Fortress-M) vel BM Oplot.
3) Merkava Mk4 but overall in my opinion it is too big, way to big.
4) Leclerc SXXI (S3) T11.
These designs in my opinion have potential but as I said, redesign is needed.
In India? I did not see ERAWA 1 or ERAWA 2 on Indian T-72M1's.T-72M1 are update in Poland, ERA suit was provided from Polish firm..
Well there are 3 guns that can suit well IA needs.1.Its upto Army decision, for most its a obvious thing that Smooth-bore is better..
2.Gun should able to put shells at 3000meters wheeled or Chassis, 120mm is the hint..
3.Logestics in sence of Ammo, Spares elctronics, etc....
Getting Logistic straight will only happen when we have Arjun, FMBT together with no T-tanks, Also their is a FICV race is one, My assumption is which ever private firm would won its vehicle would be used for MGS and ICV/IFV purpose..
Now on MGS part, It will be decided when we will have the winner in country, Probably if Anders see active duty in IA, We may use the same gun..
US M360 and M360A1 tandem, first gun is for vehicles lighter than 40 tons, second is gun for MBT's, these guns share most common components.
German Rhinemetall 120mm LLR gun.
RUAG CTG L50 gun.
All these guns can be mounted on tracked and wheeled hulls... at least US M360 and M360A1 can be used such way. All are compatibile with NATO ammunition.
ERAWA-2 decreased capabilities of PzF-3T tandem warhead to such point that remains of shaped charge jet were unabale to perforate RHA plate behind ERA.ERAWA-2 based on RDX ? Btw it decrease Tandam war head by what percentage ( Approx ) ?
So it decreased it to probably also 70-80% and rest was stoped by RHA plate.