Anarchism vs Chaos - Libertarianism and it's critics

ace009

Freakin' Fighter fan
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
1,662
Likes
526
This is a thread where I hope people will wade in with their informed views - I request that the members refrain from base comments, uninformed rants and dick-ish posts and express their opinions in a true libertarian/ non-libertarian fashion ... :D

Question 1 - What is libertarianism and how is it related to anarchism?

Question 2 - What are it's advantages/ pros?

Question 3 - What are it's cons/ critics?
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
One thing that is certain is that anachism is a pipedream. It will only work if every person is sane and everyone shares the exact same worldly viewpoints otherwise the powerful will trample upon everyone in open view. It will come down to tribalism because human beings are social creatures and wont live alone individually.
 

civfanatic

Retired
Ambassador
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
4,562
Likes
2,572
Question 1 - What is libertarianism and how is it related to anarchism?
The definition of libertarianism varies from person to person and also from country to country. In general, libertarianism can be defined as a philosophy that seeks to maximize individual rights and, simultaneously, minimize the power of government. Since anarchy is defined as the absence of a government, where the people have maximum individual rights, it naturally follows that anarchism is the final manifestation of libertarianism.


Question 2 - What are it's advantages/ pros?
The protection of individual rights, such as the right to protest, right to information, and others. A country with a substantial libertarian tendency can effectively keep government in check and prevent authoritarianism from ever forming.


Question 3 - What are it's cons/ critics?
While individual liberties must be preserved, it is also true that too many liberties can destroy a country. There are certain areas where a government, acting in the interest of the nation as a whole, must intervene. There is a reason why states formed in the first place; the "state of nature", with its inherent chaos and instability, in not conducive to human society. Large human societies need powerful states because we need stability.

I always found it amusing how, in the United States, a corporation is considered the same as an individual under the law, and is thus entitled to the same rights as an individual is under the Constitution. This is a blatant misuse of libertarian philosophy if I ever saw one.
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top