Killbot
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
- Messages
- 1,890
- Likes
- 4,026
12 fightersAircrafts being orders now can be expected to see 35-40 years of service.
12 fightersAircrafts being orders now can be expected to see 35-40 years of service.
They just delivered the last batch. Its was a 22 year long induction process.12 fighters
And I think Airforce will upgrade only those Su-30mki's which were inducted after 2005.They just delivered the last batch. Its was a 22 year long induction process.
I don't know... Possible, but equally unlikely.@Bleh I feel that ADA is in fact going for a Distributed Aperture System for AMCA, why? See this...
View attachment 79130
The backward vision of pilot will be restricted due to the cockpit shape in back, hence how will a pilot face backwards and see the bandits if the cockpit restricts backward vision? DAS!!!
I read something like that somewhere, but 2010... Less than 50 inducted before 2005. What's the point. Won't even save much money.And I think Airforce will upgrade only those Su-30mki's which were inducted after 2005.
Many Su-30MKI of IAF have DRDO DCMAWS.I don't know... Possible, but equally unlikely.
Su-30 cockpit has no backwards view either. It's got no DAS. We have no DAS displayed yet on AMCA Mark1.
Uhhh, he kinda backed you up there, unless I'm missing something. @Bleh?People here won't argue with u because of ur stupid antics and that have made u think ur half knowledge is right. Use brain dude. Good to know from where u draw ur inspiration.
Dude, airframe life of a plane with an aluminum frame won't be 50 years. One thing is for certain, it will be more of a fiasco than MiG-21 if MKIs are retained for that long.
Who is 'they'? Who mentioned that MKI will last until 2060?
@Bleh
Nah, he's (probably) right... Twitterati will need some time getting used to word of their Godfathers being questioned.Uhhh, he kinda backed you up there, unless I'm missing something. @Bleh?
ADA brochure image were uploaded by that twitter user and not opinion. But i forgot u know more than ADA.Nah, he's (probably) right... Twitterati will need some time getting used to word of their Godfathers being questioned.
Chap was definitely not a lurker on DFI.
I don't see it sensible either that a pilot will physically turn his neck at such high speeds? Isn't it?@Bleh I feel that ADA is in fact going for a Distributed Aperture System for AMCA, why? See this...
View attachment 79130
The backward vision of pilot will be restricted due to the cockpit shape in back, hence how will a pilot face backwards and see the bandits if the cockpit restricts backward vision? DAS!!!
Su30 MKI have 4 point DCMAWS and AMCA is planned for all 6 points which will be improved ones.I don't see it sensible either that a pilot will physically turn his neck at such high speeds? Isn't it?
And like your other claims, this remains wrong... Astra Mark1 was repeatedly displayed on ADAs's own renders in AMCA internal bay, multiple times.I said astra mk1 cant be included in amca because of its dimensions...
I happens to have that ADA brochure, child. Recieved from the same person he got it from. Two pdfs I shared in the Aero India thread here, you can download of you want.
And like your other claims, that remains wrong... Astra Mark1 was repeatedly displayed on ADAs's own renders in AMCA internal bay, multiple times.
View attachment 79177View attachment 79178
And if you make claims like "future missiles are going to be developed" you have to atleast name which missile project & an official source for that info.
I happens to have that ADA brochure, child. Recieved from the same person he got it from. Two pdfs I shared in the Aero India thread here, you can download for yourself if you want.
And like your other claims, this remains wrong... Astra Mark1 was repeatedly displayed on ADAs's own renders in AMCA internal bay, multiple times.
View attachment 79177View attachment 79178
And if you make claims like "future missiles are going to be developed" you have to atleast name which missile project & an official source for that info.
Astra mk1 will go in internal bay, may be Astra mk2 also if increase in length will be less than 300mm. Don't ask me for source as I don't have this time.Can twin racks for WVRs/BVRs be accommodated in the IWB? Also, wouldn't it be better to carry something like 2 ASRAAM along with ground package than BVR?
Oh yes. If the longer Mark2 can fit, the Mark1 definitely will. Although SFDR may be operational by the time AMCA enter production.Astra mk1 will go in internal bay, may be Astra mk2 also if increase in length will be less than 300mm. Don't ask me for source as I don't have this time.
Isn't the scaling process helping , try to comapre ratio of aircraft lenght to iwb in comparison to what ratio is in image , you will get a fair enough comparisonView attachment 79202
Oh yes. If the longer Mark2 can fit, the Mark1 definitely will. Although SFDR may be operational by the time AMCA enter production.
Frustratingly, I have failed to find the dimensions of the internal bays.
Can you tell me the differences between IRST, DAS and EOTS?View attachment 79202
Oh yes. If the longer Mark2 can fit, the Mark1 definitely will. Although SFDR may be operational by the time AMCA enter production.
Frustratingly, I have failed to find its dimensions of the internal bays.
ALL are situational awareness system , Irst is a search and track system functional in IR band , DAS is just a combination of sensor which cover a volume around your plane , like rwr , maws , irst type sensor all working together in sensor fusion unlike irst which are generally forward mounted .Can you tell me the differences between IRST, DAS and EOTS?