AMCA - Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (HAL)

FalconSlayers

धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः
New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
28,260
Likes
195,943
Country flag
@Bleh I feel that ADA is in fact going for a Distributed Aperture System for AMCA, why? See this...
1613883963482.jpeg


The backward vision of pilot will be restricted due to the cockpit shape in back, hence how will a pilot face backwards and see the bandits if the cockpit restricts backward vision? DAS!!!
 

Bleh

Laughing member
New Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,239
Likes
26,077
Country flag
@Bleh I feel that ADA is in fact going for a Distributed Aperture System for AMCA, why? See this...
View attachment 79130

The backward vision of pilot will be restricted due to the cockpit shape in back, hence how will a pilot face backwards and see the bandits if the cockpit restricts backward vision? DAS!!!
I don't know... Possible, but equally unlikely.

Su-30 cockpit has no backwards view either. It's got no DAS. We have no DAS displayed yet on AMCA Mark1.

And I think Airforce will upgrade only those Su-30mki's which were inducted after 2005.
I read something like that somewhere, but 2010... Less than 50 inducted before 2005. What's the point. Won't even save much money.

Anything official tho?
 

Killbot

New Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
1,890
Likes
4,026
Country flag
People here won't argue with u because of ur stupid antics and that have made u think ur half knowledge is right. Use brain dude. Good to know from where u draw ur inspiration.
Uhhh, he kinda backed you up there, unless I'm missing something. @Bleh?
 

Ghost hale

New Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Messages
548
Likes
1,701
Country flag
Dude, airframe life of a plane with an aluminum frame won't be 50 years. One thing is for certain, it will be more of a fiasco than MiG-21 if MKIs are retained for that long.

Who is 'they'? Who mentioned that MKI will last until 2060?
@Bleh

Just for example... Structural life can be improved.
 

Ghost hale

New Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Messages
548
Likes
1,701
Country flag
Nah, he's (probably) right... Twitterati will need some time getting used to word of their Godfathers being questioned.

Chap was definitely not a lurker on DFI.
ADA brochure image were uploaded by that twitter user and not opinion. But i forgot u know more than ADA.
One more thing don't create misconceptions. I said astra mk1 cant be included in amca because of its dimensions not that astra series itself won't be placed.future missiles are to be developed which can be used with IWB.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
@Bleh I feel that ADA is in fact going for a Distributed Aperture System for AMCA, why? See this...
View attachment 79130

The backward vision of pilot will be restricted due to the cockpit shape in back, hence how will a pilot face backwards and see the bandits if the cockpit restricts backward vision? DAS!!!
I don't see it sensible either that a pilot will physically turn his neck at such high speeds? Isn't it?
 

Bleh

Laughing member
New Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,239
Likes
26,077
Country flag
I happens to have that ADA brochure, child. Recieved from the same person he got it from. Two pdfs I shared in the Aero India thread here, you can download for yourself if you want.

I said astra mk1 cant be included in amca because of its dimensions...
And like your other claims, this remains wrong... Astra Mark1 was repeatedly displayed on ADAs's own renders in AMCA internal bay, multiple times.
AMCA Mk1.png
1551891026812.png


And if you make claims like "future missiles are going to be developed" you have to atleast name which missile project & an official source for that info.
 
Last edited:

Ghost hale

New Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Messages
548
Likes
1,701
Country flag
I happens to have that ADA brochure, child. Recieved from the same person he got it from. Two pdfs I shared in the Aero India thread here, you can download of you want.



And like your other claims, that remains wrong... Astra Mark1 was repeatedly displayed on ADAs's own renders in AMCA internal bay, multiple times.
View attachment 79177View attachment 79178

And if you make claims like "future missiles are going to be developed" you have to atleast name which missile project & an official source for that info.
EtWY7vrUUAM0_5f.jpg


This is from ADA brochure in aero india 2021. External pylon have Astra MK1 type model. IWB have separate model. There was back news also that Astra MK1 cant be placed in IWB because of dimensions so sperate iterations will be developed. No missile was named so how am i supposed to create name for it. The info which was available i mentioned. I am not sure what is so bizzare that u can't comprehend it. AMCA is planned for 2030. For all practical reasons better astra iterations will be available by then.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Shekhar Singh

New Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2017
Messages
206
Likes
451
Country flag
I happens to have that ADA brochure, child. Recieved from the same person he got it from. Two pdfs I shared in the Aero India thread here, you can download for yourself if you want.



And like your other claims, this remains wrong... Astra Mark1 was repeatedly displayed on ADAs's own renders in AMCA internal bay, multiple times.
View attachment 79177View attachment 79178

And if you make claims like "future missiles are going to be developed" you have to atleast name which missile project & an official source for that info.
Can twin racks for WVRs/BVRs be accommodated in the IWB? Also, wouldn't it be better to carry something like 2 ASRAAM along with ground package than BVR?
Astra mk1 will go in internal bay, may be Astra mk2 also if increase in length will be less than 300mm. Don't ask me for source as I don't have this time.
 

Bleh

Laughing member
New Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,239
Likes
26,077
Country flag
IMG-20210221-WA0007.jpg


Astra mk1 will go in internal bay, may be Astra mk2 also if increase in length will be less than 300mm. Don't ask me for source as I don't have this time.
Oh yes. If the longer Mark2 can fit, the Mark1 definitely will. Although SFDR may be operational by the time AMCA enter production.

Frustratingly, I have failed to find its dimensions of the internal bays.
 
Last edited:

Lonewolf

Psychopathic Neighbour
New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
7,365
Likes
27,771
Country flag
View attachment 79202



Oh yes. If the longer Mark2 can fit, the Mark1 definitely will. Although SFDR may be operational by the time AMCA enter production.

Frustratingly, I have failed to find the dimensions of the internal bays.
Isn't the scaling process helping , try to comapre ratio of aircraft lenght to iwb in comparison to what ratio is in image , you will get a fair enough comparison
 

FalconSlayers

धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः
New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
28,260
Likes
195,943
Country flag
View attachment 79202



Oh yes. If the longer Mark2 can fit, the Mark1 definitely will. Although SFDR may be operational by the time AMCA enter production.

Frustratingly, I have failed to find its dimensions of the internal bays.
Can you tell me the differences between IRST, DAS and EOTS?
 

Lonewolf

Psychopathic Neighbour
New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
7,365
Likes
27,771
Country flag
Can you tell me the differences between IRST, DAS and EOTS?
ALL are situational awareness system , Irst is a search and track system functional in IR band , DAS is just a combination of sensor which cover a volume around your plane , like rwr , maws , irst type sensor all working together in sensor fusion unlike irst which are generally forward mounted .

EOTS are generally for long range search and tracking but conformal giving less signature and different bandwidth
 

Articles

Top