Al-Khalid MBT And Pakistani Armour

[The Last Stand]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Really?

Source please

Def.pk. See. If you can't find it, I will give the link in a PM later today.

 

[farhan_9909]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Real or fake?

 

[militarysta]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Real or fake?

Fake and photoshop. Those APFSDS picture during separate sabot is well known in other sources. Just photoshoped

 

[Andrei_bt]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Kind of PShop?

 

[Andrei_bt]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Real or fake?

if they have such non stright line of fire for APFSDS it's better to be PShop ))))

 

[Dazzler]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Def.pk. See. If you can't find it, I will give the link in a PM later today.

as per you analogy, "forum link does not count as a source", keeping that in mind,

Bring something more concrete like a literature, book, article, news report etc.

A video would be too much of an ask i know

 

[The Last Stand]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

as per you analogy, "forum link does not count as a source", keeping that in mind,

Bring something more concrete like a literature, book, article, news report etc.

A video would be too much of an ask i know

You do not understand me. I was stating the fact, that some Pakistani netizens claimed that the tested Abrams had a 105 mm gun.

Claimed.

I never said it is true, did I?

Stop putting words in my mouth.

Re-read my post again please, you seem to be in a hurry while replying to them

 

[The Last Stand]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Kind of PShop?

It is not a well thought out one. The path is way too linear while the tank is angled away from the viewer.

All of us know that complete Sabot separation needs upto 500 metres to take place, that image has 3 petals separated already and the fourth one almost done so within some 10 metres.

Surely photoshop.

Also observe the fact that the motion blur is non-existent while the Muzzle Velocity of such a round is supposed to be 1700 m/s.

Motion blur is sometimes observed on photos of objects moving at quite low speeds, 30-40 km/hr.

 

[Dazzler]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Real or fake?

a bad photoshop i must say,

 

[Dazzler]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

It is not a well thought out one. The path is way too linear while the tank is angled away from the viewer.

All of us know that complete Sabot separation needs upto 500 metres to take place, that image has 3 petals separated already and the fourth one almost done so within some 10 metres.

Surely photoshop.

Also observe the fact that the motion blur is non-existent while the Muzzle Velocity of such a round is supposed to be 1700 m/s.

Motion blur is sometimes observed on photos of objects moving at quite low speeds, 30-40 km/hr.

As per the man who was involved in M1 demonstration and trials plan development, the Americans asked for a whooping $ 5 million per tank, plus there was no TOT. General Aslam Beg called off the plan for a reason. Even after some failures during trials, Army command liked the impressive protection and electronics.

 

[Kunal Biswas]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Any disclosed Official PDF file ? so we can read ..

As per the man who was involved in M1 demonstration and trials plan development, the Americans asked for a whooping $ 5 million per tank, plus there was no TOT. General Aslam Beg called off the plan for a reason. Even after some failures during trials, Army command liked the impressive protection and electronics.

 

[Dazzler]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Any disclosed Official PDF file ? so we can read ..

i am searching more data on this through internet. As soon as i find it, i will share it.

 

[The Last Stand]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

i am searching more data on this through internet. As soon as i find it, i will share it.

Possibly classified information, you will probably not find any more unless through an insider.

 

[farhan_9909]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

Possibly classified information, you will probably not find any more unless through an insider.

there is a very good insider named rommel on pakdef(not def.pk)

But dont know what has happened to him.

his last reply was like 1 and half or about 2 years before..where he said i will share a good news about Al khalid new variant.
i could be mistaken but it seem like he was from the armoured corps of PA

 

[Dazzler]

Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

there is a very good insider named rommel on pakdef(not def.pk)

But dont know what has happened to him.

his last reply was like 1 and half or about 2 years before..where he said i will share a good news about Al khalid new variant.
i could be mistaken but it seem like he was from the armoured corps of PA

Not only he is an insider but as per my info, he was serving in the military, not sure whether he is still there or not though

 

[sanaqueen]

Thanks for this interesting shearing

 

[Dazzler]

 

[shuvo@y2k10]

Re: Al-Khalid 2 Main Battle Tank

the 2008 prototype is very similar to chinese type 96 mbt in terms of exterior looks.does the al khalid 2 have anything indegeneous at all or is it a chinese hakka noodle in a pakistani packet like al khalid 1 and jf-17 or even babur missile.

 

[Rohan Nautiyal]

Underestimating the enemy is not a wise thing to do, can we just stop the Off Topic posting?

Mate, I am not underestimating our opponents,, its a fact that al khalid is nothing but a mix of t 55s and t 72. Read it in a magazine..... Arjuns are much better..... China and pak has developed it jointly, so why has PLA not inducted Al Khalid in their Tank Fleet???? Like JF 17 Thunder, co developed by Pak and China,, PLAAF has rejected that plane...... Getting now,, what I wanted to say!!

 

[Rohan Nautiyal]

Underestimating the enemy is not a wise thing to do, can we just stop the Off Topic posting?

Mate, I am not underestimating our opponents,, its a fact that al khalid is nothing but a mix of t 55s and t 72. Read it in a magazine..... Arjuns are much better..... China and pak has developed it jointly, so why has PLA not inducted Al Khalid in their Tank Fleet???? Like JF 17 Thunder, co developed by Pak and China,, PLAAF has rejected that plane...... Getting now,, what I wanted to say!!
Cheers..