Flying Dagger
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2019
- Messages
- 3,583
- Likes
- 9,441
By 2050 our adversaries will be laughing at us if we continue to use AKs by that time
Because we have been using and buying Aks since many decades easier to maintain and have proved themselves in all terrain.You don't understand what I'm trying to say . Army bought Sig 716 rifles with 7.62*51mm caliber after a competitive process and it actually suits the army's requirements . Ak 203 didn't go through any such competitive process but the proposal was finalised by a Government to Government deal . If that's not appeasing putin then what is it ? No RFI , No RFP , No competitve trials , etc . The rifle was finalised by an Inter Governmental agreement . Even a blind person will say it was a politcal decision after knowing the facts . 7.62*51mm offers greater range , greater firepower compared to 7.62*39mm . As for metallurgy , you can search about the Israeli Galil Ace . It's as tough as AK . Even Sig 716 has good metallurgy
I can clearly see you don't have any idea about rifles and are new to this so just relax and breathe.
Galil Ace is AK with western furniture we can modify our Aks too it's all about the price we pay.
Arsenal AK with folding stock costed us 27000 Rupees around while Galil Ace was quoted for 1600 dollar plus in the tender which Sig won.
Regarding 7.62 NATO vs 7.62 AK round both have their own advantage.
7.62 Ak round have comparatively less recoil then 7.62 NATO round and provide enough firepower for CQB and jungle ops. The number of rounds carried will be more too that's what they need.
We have been buying and making copy of Aks for decades but lack quality stuff and production, one of the reason our attempt with INSAS to copy AK failed.
With the Amethi based production line we are seeking a standard rifle for all troops and a learning curve for OFB to provide quality weapons that includes pistols etc in future too.