Innocent
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2017
- Messages
- 486
- Likes
- 840
Few days ago some member ( i dont remember name of said member) suggested that we should disband the airforce and split the assets between Indian army and navy, if things are really that bad and grim i then think this does not sounds that bad.In India there is an "airforce wives organization" formed specially to get Indian made planes decommissioned. They didn't succeed with the Dhruv but they managed to ground around 280 Chetak helos. In what other org will you find a case where the wife of a serving member goes to the defense minister and says "I get to have an overriding say in the kind of equipment the government buys, just because my husband is using it". These are paid protests by foreign equipment vendors to stall Indian projects.
Army, IAF ground 280 Cheetah and Chetak choppers for safety checks
So IAF grounded those choppers but the Navy is still using them with pride. Even the Army is operating them in Siachen. Only IAF has an issue with everything.
They lobbied and grounded the Chetak fleet and they went ahead to issue RFP for new imported helos and did corruption even in that! << (that was their intention for the protest anyway, but they got caught).
@sorcerer Dono me problems hai, neither HAL nor IAF is clean. On one side HAL had sold 4 Dhruv helicopters to Ecuador. 2 of them crashed and Ecuador grounded the whole fleet. This time, HAL says "pilot error", like Sukhoi says about IAF. Everyone be passing the buck.
On the other side IAF is also not far behind. They have expertise in crashing all sorts of planes. It's not limited to Russian MIGs. They even crashed a C130 Hercules which has a clean track record. Abh kisko blame karoge? C130 is not made by HAL and no IAF wife went to defense minister because when foreign plane is purchased, everyone gets a proper commission, so no one cares about "bad equipment".
IAF chief himself has said, several higher ups in Congress had "shared" the bribe money from foreign imports. He's not even denying it, he's just saying, mai chor hu toh UPA bhi chor ho. Good explanation bro. UPA chor hai ye pata tha, tum chor ho ye naya naya pata chala hai. They were threatening that if the govt doesn't agree to buy more foreign stuff, then they wont induct Tejas. Ultimately they were forced to induct it under govt pressure. The govt must simply start recruitment and training of new IAF staff on the platform that the govt intends to use, and court marshal those who take press conferences and blackmailing the govt.
Imagine you were the leader of the nation facing imminent/permanent threat from neighbor, what would you do if :
Where is national interest in all of this? It's running on the whims of the IAF bois and their wives to decide what equipment we buy. They decide what equipment we buy, so that they can crash it, and we must also not question them. LGB was invented/made available for commercial sale in the 80's itself. The IAF "forgot" to induct them for a decade. They kept lobbying for Mirage but forgot to buy LGB when it was needed in Kargil, we had to buy at exorbitant rates at the last moment (perhaps there's no sales commission offered on LGB). What opinion would you have about the DNA of such an organization? (not a rhetoric question, I'm really asking, at what point do we say, let's introspect.)
- The IAF stalls your attempt to build your indigenous planes for decades
- Then claims that since there is no Indian equipment, let us buy foreign equipment
- Once you agree to import some, cooks up 5-front war scenario to force you to buy a 100 more
- Keeps crashing planes in monthly ceremonies
- IAF wives keep lobbying you to decommission an entire fleet
- When Kargil war actually happens, and you ask your IAF guy to drop a laser guided bomb, he tells you "sir, we...umm..forgot to induct that weapon in our arsenal..we need to go to Israeli Flipkart and buy tomorrow."
I know most member here would find this suggestion absurd, silly and even childesh ( it mostly is).
But it is possible??