- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 32,663
- Likes
- 151,106
Donno mate, maybe others can answer...............would hellfire managed to overcome modern hard kill APS like afghanit though?
Donno mate, maybe others can answer...............would hellfire managed to overcome modern hard kill APS like afghanit though?
Hellfire can do top attack so yes they are very hard to counter for APS.would hellfire managed to overcome modern hard kill APS like afghanit though?
I doubt jungle or mountains are problem or even open area's & error Margins are no longer a problem for most hard kill APS.Hellfire can do top attack so yes they are very hard to counter for APS.
Other than that APS has a very high error margin.
APS can't function properly in Mountains and Deep Jungles, u need an open area for APS to show its maximum efficiency.
Even with all that APS isn't perfected yet and their is high chance that it'll fail to counter incoming warhead.
But we don't need to worry about that right now. Our Immediate opponent Pakis don't have any such tech and even China hasn't been successfull in replicating it.
would hellfire managed to overcome modern hard kill APS like afghanit though?
Land based atoms in top attack mode in the terminal stage approach at a 90 degree angle..Definitely. Hellfire can attack a target at vertical 90degree angle. Just look at these so called samurai Hellfore attacks:
That one too like this Javelin testLand based atoms in top attack mode in the terminal stage approach at a 90 degree angle..
I believe every deal includes that . Basically Americans are just ripping us off. It's cost is 150 million dollars per plane which make it only 60-70 million dollars cheaper then Rafale..Wait till bill of material is released. It will contain list of all items being purchased as part of the deal including extra engines, weapons package, training & maintenance.
Me personally, I would like to see purchase of more hellfire. Just so that IA can do comparative trails with Helina, and so that we can know for a fact what the fuss is all about hellfire.
why blame the Americans, when the fault lies within. No other country has two nuclear armed neighbours who also happen to be adversaries, and yet we are dependant on outside purchases of defence equipment.I believe every deal includes that . Basically Americans are just ripping us off. It's cost is 150 million dollars per plane which make it only 60-70 million dollars cheaper then Rafale..
Right now IAF has received 12 Apache helicopters and rest 10 will be delivered by next year.Currently how many apaches are inducted in IAF? Last I heard we received only 4
Americans put a gun to Indian leadership and made them sign these deals?I believe every deal includes that . Basically Americans are just ripping us off. It's cost is 150 million dollars per plane which make it only 60-70 million dollars cheaper then Rafale..
Boeing Says Bangladesh is Considering AH-64E Apache Attack Helicopters
☰ Menu
Boeing AH-64 Apache. Photo credit: Boeing
Boeing confirmed to reports that its AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopter was “down-selected” for a potential acquisition program with the Bangladeshi armed forces.
Terry Jamison, the director of international vertical lift sales at Boeing, stated that Bangladesh is actively considering the Apache on both cost and capability grounds (source: Jane’s Defence Weekly).
This statement follows an earlier news report from Nikkei Asian Review of Dhaka initiating formal talks with Washington for the Apache and a range of other armaments.
To start the process, Bangladesh agreed to sign two critical agreements with the US, the Acquisitions and Cross Servicing Agreement (ACSA) and the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA).
It will take up to four years to negotiate and sign both agreements, though it is possible that preliminary negotiations for major defence equipment could occur concurrently.
It should be noted that the GSOMIA and ACSA serve an essential role in supporting US security interests in the Pacific Ocean. Thus, the importance of the US’ negotiations with Bangladesh on these fronts should not be underestimated, it could amount to significant procurements through the 2020s.
In regards to Bangladesh’s interest in the Apache Guardian. The Bangladeshi military evidently has a new attack helicopter requirement under its modernization plans. The capability would enable it to provide its ground forces with close air support (CAS) against armour and infantry threats.
However, it would be interesting to see if Bangladesh tries working with one main supplier, in this scenario Boeing, to fulfill multiple requirements. So, in addition to attack helicopters, might it look to Boeing for a new multi-role combat aircraft as well? It is worth noting that the Bangladesh Air Force’s (BAF) initial new fighter requirement (set under a tender in 2017) was for up to 12 twin-engine fighters.
To defend itself from being labelled as Chinese stooge, by Americans.I wonder why would BD need such high tech helos/ weapons and submarines, to defend from whom??