Vamsi
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2020
- Messages
- 4,858
- Likes
- 29,449

No, it's just about coatings on SCBs, not the blade castingUS provide India technology for single crystal turbine blades used in jet engines.
No, it's just about coatings on SCBs, not the blade castingUS provide India technology for single crystal turbine blades used in jet engines.
Stop sprouting nonsense from your rear end, either back up your claim with a source or shut up.Be aware of the fact: it took Russians 5-6 years to add canard on their Su-30 after their Su-30 entered service even though they already had other plane with canard designing experience before that.
Considering Indian scientists had much less experience in aerodynamic design comparing to Russians and zero experience of canard before MK2, the time should be much longer.
So, my guess is: when ADA made up the timeline, they probably believed that French would provide some help in aerodynamic outfit (who had plenty experiences in this), but the deal wasn't settled successfully.
Breath... ...Can you tell us what do we lack?
He's putting the cart before the horse. It would've been hopelessly one sided with fatal dependence on the US had we not struck this deal & depended solely on imports. Right now what we've done is mitigation of the risk factor to a great extent.![]()
F414 jet engines deal could increase India's reliance on US
American weapon systems come with a lot of conditionswww.theweek.in
What is the logic of keeping it at 80% why not 100% what parts are they keeping away from us?
That 20% is everything you need to produce the engine yourself. Without that 20%, India is completely dependent on US to keep its Tejas planes flying.What is the logic of keeping it at 80% why not 100% what parts are they keeping away from us?
What is the logic of keeping it at 80% why not 100% what parts are they keeping away from us?
Don't know whether I am right or wrong, a general trend I see in terms of indegenization is percentage by value is always less than percentage by component. Some subsystem costs more, some less. For example, in a news on LCH it was like 75% Indegenous by component and 60% Indegenous by value (figures may slightly differ, but trend is same).What is the logic of keeping it at 80% why not 100% what parts are they keeping away from us?
Parts involved in the hot section , the core of the TF. If that's known we can mfg the TF on our own without US help .What is the logic of keeping it at 80% why not 100% what parts are they keeping away from us?
Might sound retarded but I think we should drop this deal and and go grind really really hard to achieve the remaining 20%.Parts involved in the hot section , the core of the TF. If that's known we can mfg the TF on our own without US help .
Yea drop the deal and drop Tejas and amca too then? Cause then both of these planes are delayed by atleast 6-10 yearsMight sound retarded but I think we should drop this deal and and go grind really really hard to achieve the remaining 20%.
This deal seems to be our insurance against failure in developing hot section.
Or is that 20% really that unachievable?
That 20% is the reason why the Kaveri as it exists today is under performing. As far as the rest of your post goes there are other developments in the pipeline to cater to the issue of developing a TF in-house. Refer to my previous post.Might sound retarded but I think we should drop this deal and and go grind really really hard to achieve the remaining 20%.
This deal seems to be our insurance against failure in developing hot section.
Or is that 20% really that unachievable?
Just get a license production deal for 120kN engine.. plis Modi. I'm sowwy about calling your govt a hijra. Swear won't do it again no matter what the fuck up
Point is learningMight sound retarded but I think we should drop this deal and and go grind really really hard to achieve the remaining 20%.
This deal seems to be our insurance against failure in developing hot section.
Or is that 20% really that unachievable?
Drop the deal, lose even the 80% and get back to square 1. We have been grinding on Kaveri for 40 years- and it is still not considered good enough for Mk1 Tejas.Might sound retarded but I think we should drop this deal and and go grind really really hard to achieve the remaining 20%.
It's not the 20% it is the full 100%. Otherwise, why would we seek it's ToT if we have mastered it?That 20% is the reason why the Kaveri as it exists today is under performing
Might sound retarded but I think we should drop this deal and and go grind really really hard to achieve the remaining 20%.
This deal seems to be our insurance against failure in developing hot section.
Or is that 20% really that unachievable?
Other than the hot parts of the engine, the rest of the Kaveri is delivering fine. How else could it have been chosen to power the Ghatak or GTRE could come up with a 12 MW Marine version of the Kaveri ? That's precisely the 20% which is out of the scope of the ToT with GE & that's precisely what we've finally got down to mfg at HAL Koraput with the AL-31 ( still a few missing parts of the puzzle though for which we're dependent on the Russians).It's not the 20% it is the full 100%. Otherwise, why would we seek it's ToT if we have mastered it?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Knowledge Repository | 6 | |
![]() |
AERO INDIA 2021 | Science and Technology | 308 | |
![]() |
ADA Tejas (LCA) News and Discussions | Indian Air Force | 17457 | |
P | ADA DRDO and HAL Delays a threat to National Security | Internal Security | 20 |