The end result depends on the between processes approved in time. Sadly in our country, between process approval speed is as good as bunty's soap from lifebuoy ad, more so when the end user has given so many rather condescending remarks imo towards Tejasmk2 while simping as hard as he can for MRFA which is understandable and alas the RFI has still not been floated, so Jai mata di, I don't see the first MRFA fighter being inducted in this decade,.So then by which capacity and confidence were these big mouths boasting to the media about its roll out? It wasnt some low level employee saying that. It was the chief himself.
This is like building a skyscraper without a foundation.
lmao kf-21, like a kid in a toyshop.
Su30? Why we don't need more air superiority fighter jets? We need multirole fighters - Rafales - Yes, SU 30 - No.lmao kf-21, like a kid in a toyshop.
Although I support the idea of a few more Su30 squadrons if we can implement the planned upgrades
We have already inducted more than we should have due to mmrca and Tejas delay. The design is early 4th gen - late 3rd gen Even with upgrade it wont be at par with Su 35 or Su 57.lmao kf-21, like a kid in a toyshop.
Although I support the idea of a few more Su30 squadrons if we can implement the planned upgrades
Su30? Why we don't need more air superiority fighter jets? We need multirole fighters - Rafales - Yes, SU 30 - No.
Sorry but j20 is a better stealth aircraft than su57 despite its canards and it's quite hard to fathom any jet with 1-5 m² rcs going against a LO/VLO jet and win head to head.Su-30 MKIs with the upgrade package will be a very potent fighter and a match for any J-20 thrown against it. Only F-22, F-35, or Su-57 would do better.
The IAF chief seems to think otherwise.Sorry but j20 is a better stealth aircraft than su57 despite its canards and it's quite hard to fathom any jet with 1-5 m² rcs going against a LO/VLO jet and win head to head.
My argument seems logical to me if there is such statement then as a layman I would retract my statement.The IAF chief seems to think otherwise.
Look at their underbelly.The IAF chief seems to think otherwise.
Those are removable weapon stations under the wings and those flaps are closing up after the wheels are retracted.
Bruh,, I am talking about underslung engines.. missing uniform surface.Those are removable weapon stations under the wings and those flaps are closing up after the wheels are retracted.
Kf21 block 1 has no ground attack capability and block 2 doesn't existlmao kf-21, like a kid in a toyshop.
Although I support the idea of a few more Su30 squadrons if we can implement the planned upgrades
Still one of the best 4.5 gen with low rcsSu-57 is just another 4.5+ gen fighter. Period. The Russians had to compromise between the money needed to develop a new VLO design from scratch and optimising from the Su-30 family and they choose the latter. IAF jumped out of this project at the first instance they smelled rat
So you are saying that Su-57 does not have the low rcs required to be a 5th generation fighter?Su-57 is just another 4.5+ gen fighter. Period. The Russians had to compromise between the money needed to develop a new VLO design from scratch and optimising from the Su-30 family and they choose the latter. IAF jumped out of this project at the first instance they smelled rat
Has IAF carry out any RCS testing to verify that return?Bruh,, I am talking about underslung engines.. missing uniform surface.
Ending OT discussion.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Knowledge Repository | 6 | ||
AERO INDIA 2021 | Science and Technology | 308 | ||
ADA Tejas (LCA) News and Discussions | Indian Air Force | 17457 | ||
P | ADA DRDO and HAL Delays a threat to National Security | Internal Security | 20 |