WarriorIndian
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2009
- Messages
- 328
- Likes
- 1,038
Not if they want our friendship against China.But USA is sugar daddy of Pakistan
Not if they want our friendship against China.But USA is sugar daddy of Pakistan
Intellectual property.Why not copy all those engines .
Can't drdo guys , copy them ?
It’s not easy China has spent billions of dollars in copying engine technology and still they don’t have reliable engines Iran is also trying to copy American technology with little to no successWhy not copy all those engines .
Can't drdo guys , copy them ?
And then get hit by sanctions the kind of which are reserved only for war.. Eg.. Fuel embargo etcYou can copy the engine.......from the design to the exact shape of the components. But not the metallurgy, and not the fadec source code, and not the computer chips that run those.
At best we can do a component by component copy by geometry using our own materials, and use our own fadec to see what happens.
But how will they get to know ?And then get hit by sanctions the kind of which are reserved only for war.. Eg.. Fuel embargo etc
If US stops engine export then it's their loss as India already has a backup engine in French safran M88. Also France has offered help to develop fighter engine with India and also suggested to use the core of M88 in Kaveri ( rejected by DRDO as we want to develop our own core but needed help).India should buy engines and spares in advance to last for next 10 years atleast maybe we will come with our indigenous engines in next 10 years
Why not copy all those engines .
Can't drdo guys , copy them ?
Nope. You can't copy that either. That shape has been optimized for that particular pressure ratio, turbine entry temperature, etc. The optimization is also material specific and the moment you change the material, you suddenly become unable to achieve the performance parameters you set for the engine. Change of material changes the components' creep and fatigue behaviour, changes its vibration response (along with that of the entire engine). The TBC that worked suddenly doesn't work anymore. All these changes lead to the shape that you copied not being optimal anymore. So now maybe you try to find the optimal shape, but how? Without the CFD code the Americans used to model the airflow and multiphase interactions in the original design, you won't be able to achieve the same result. Then there are features that can only be created by certain manufacturing methods.You can copy the engine.......from the design to the exact shape of the components. But not the metallurgy, and not the fadec source code, and not the computer chips that run those.
At best we can do a component by component copy by geometry using our own materials, and use our own fadec to see what happens.
They keep inspecting their engines and how are our scientists going to copy the alloy which has been used to make the engine it’s very difficult thing takes decades to masterBut how will they get to know ?
( Iam a noob, in these matters so kindly ignore my probably idiotic questions )
Thats what technical intelligence does..But how will they get to know ?
( Iam a noob, in these matters so kindly ignore my probably idiotic questions )
You can't copy that either.They keep inspecting their engines and how are our scientists going to copy the alloy which has been used to make the engine it’s very difficult thing takes decades to master
Just like Chinese, India intelligence agency does steal too. The difference is the extent and consequence of this kind activities from India are not serious enough currently to alarm Americans.Thought it’s possible to steal the technology through espionage but that will impact India US relations
USA and UK have stolen technology from France and other countries in the past Pakistan stole nuclear technology from USA it’s difficult but not impossible the only thing required is a strong political willYou can't copy that either.
You can analyze the ingredients of the alloy, but you won't know how these ingredients are processed and manufactured so the final alloy can perform the same features.
You may think espionage can get the answer for you, but unfortunately it doesn't help much either. Even your tech intelligence get that, in most of time, your industrial departments of supply chain can't produce by these foreign processing map. For example, one department may tell you that the material produced their factory can't reach the required purity, another one may tell you that their production equipment can't monitor the temperature precise enough in the processing, the third one may say that they can provide the satisfied material but the cost is sky high, etc, etc. Eventually, you have to give it up and go back to your scientists to re-develop a new alloy which may not be as good as those foreign alloy but close enough and more importantly your domestic industries can produce within accepted cost.
Just like Chinese, India intelligence agency does steal too. The difference is the extent and consequence of this kind activities from India are not serious enough currently to alarm Americans.
Didn't stole actually. It got them into plate from US, UK and China once Indian nukes came into existence in 1974.Pakistan stole nuclear technology from USA
Every country has stole some techs from others.USA and UK have stolen technology from France and other countries in the past Pakistan stole nuclear technology from USA it’s difficult but not impossible the only thing required is a strong political will
Kaviri would get some technologies from M88 if everything goes well.Guys can tejas and its upcoming varients be equiped with M88 or any other alternative?
Due to much higher internal fuel, overall T/W ratio of Mark2 is same as Tejas Mark1... About 0.95 (considering present F414, not EPE)Thrust to weight ratio of mwf?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Knowledge Repository | 6 | ||
AERO INDIA 2021 | Science and Technology | 308 | ||
ADA Tejas (LCA) News and Discussions | Indian Air Force | 17457 | ||
P | ADA DRDO and HAL Delays a threat to National Security | Internal Security | 20 |