I believe he means to be symbolic about his comparisons to F-16s and F-18s. Considering that the engine problem is sorted out, I am sure that the Tejas would perform upto the F-18's standards in the light combat field. It needs an AESA radar and a good engine to match which will be covered soon.A good informative article, but seemed to me that the author is too much swayed to give a proper view. A a/c which haven't even joined any force and don't have a decent engine yet is compared to F-16, F-18 - and for gods sake Su-30?!!!!!!
If its for the Mission Computer, then we are using 2 Intel 80386 processors, dual core.Some unseen but important question are yet to answered.
(1) Did DRDO designed the microprocessors or are we importing them?
(2) Are the microprocessors manufactured in India?
(3) What is the flop rate per second?
Many such shadowed question must be answered.
Intel 80386 is a display processor. It is like a grapic card required for the glass cockpit.If its for the Mission Computer, then we are using 2 Intel 80386 processors, dual core.
As per this pdf , what P2P has said is correct.Intel 80386 is a display processor. It is like a grapic card required for the glass cockpit.
Its a full fledged processor that came out in 1985. Its not a video card.Intel 80386 is a display processor. It is like a grapic card required for the glass cockpit.
You know nothing about fighters and weaponization. The LCA can fire anything that America has to offer. You need integration, other than that, the missile just needs to be attached to the LCA. That's all.firstly LCA is far away from matching the SH, secondly there is no comparison, even full equipped the LCA wont be able to match the SH simply because it doesn't have the weapons flexibility to match both Falcon and SH. In these terms the Rafale and EF also couldn't catch up, LCA cant do it, not now, not in 10 years. The super viper and super bug can deploy the most variety of very effective long range and accurate weapons in the world
I don't understand what that means. What's the MRCA or SH in particular to do with the LCA program.and are both extensively combat proven. besides LCA is so slow in its progress that i dont expect LCA mk-2 to be ready before 2013 or even later. It will barely take to the air once mrca starts arriving.
i am not the one who started the comparisonsI believe he means to be symbolic about his comparisons to F-16s and F-18s. Considering that the engine problem is sorted out, I am sure that the Tejas would perform upto the F-18's standards in the light combat field. It needs an AESA radar and a good engine to match which will be covered soon.
Although ADA did spend a little too long in designing this aircraft, I am sure that the time spent is worth what we have as the end product-- an aircraft from a developing country that is not a copy from any other at the same time matches the capabilities of other aircraft in its category from the developed world. Tejas has rightfully earned its place. I think it would be appropriate to blame the political leadership of the country instead of the scientists. The latter work hard to give the best indigenous products to the nation while the former try to kill it in favour of kickbacks from foreign suppliers.
SH cant fire Russian, Indian and Chinese weapons as of now.weapons flexibility,
Ahem... not even crossed 45deg at 200knots. Cannon fodder for the Mig-29.unlimited aoa.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
AERO INDIA 2021 | Science and Technology | 308 | ||
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Knowledge Repository | 6 | ||
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Indian Air Force | 8939 | ||
P | ADA DRDO and HAL Delays a threat to National Security | Internal Security | 20 |