Enjoy, these choice quotes:
http://ajaishukla.blogspot.in/2016/07/taking-forward-tejas.html
http://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...g-as-key-fighter/article8657300.ece?css=print
- Published: May 28, 2016 03:58 IST | Updated: May 28, 2016 13:00 IST - NEW DELHI, May 28, 2016 - Tejas to replace MiG as key fighter - by Dinakar Peri
http://ajaishukla.blogspot.in/2016/07/taking-forward-tejas.html
Also this earlier one:The IAF has already detailed the Tejas’ performance parameters, announcing: “The LCA has a very competitive and cotemporary operational envelope. It is capable of operations up to an altitude of 50,000 feet and a maximum speed of 1.6 Mach at [high] altitudes or 730 knots… at low levels. The aircraft [can turn at] +8G to -2.5G (which allows it to U-turn in 350 metres) in operationally clean configuration… or +6G to -2.5G with other external stores.”
http://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...g-as-key-fighter/article8657300.ece?css=print
- Published: May 28, 2016 03:58 IST | Updated: May 28, 2016 13:00 IST - NEW DELHI, May 28, 2016 - Tejas to replace MiG as key fighter - by Dinakar Peri
& from same report of Hindu.“LCA is mainstay. There will be seven squadrons of it. It is 3-4 times better than MiG-21s,” he told The Hindu on Thursday giving an overview of the IAF modernisation plans. About 250 MiG-21s were in service, most of which would be phased out in the next 10-15 years, Mr. Parrikar said, adding that they would be “replaced by the LCA and another single-engine fighter.” “We may consider. I have not said we are looking. Tomorrow we may decide to have everything from Tejas. The second version of Tejas, which is an improved version, is coming into production after the first two squadrons,” he said. Mirage and Jaguar upgrade programmes were currently under way which, Mr. Parrikar said, would add 10-30 years to their life. “In five to six years, we should start getting new double-engine fighters, not Rafales only,” he stated.
Mr. Parrikar said the third squadron with 1A would be a highly improved version, which was under trials. “Those special additives are under trial like firing a Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missile etc,” he said. “Functionally, the LCA is better than many other foreign fighters. It reacts very smoothly, fly-by-wire, its turn radius is very good, manoeuvrability is very good but it has limitation in the sense that it is a light combatant… It cannot go into deep penetration… It is mostly good for dogfights in your own sky or to degrade the opponent Army’s command posts,” Mr. Parrikar observed and added that “we need more twin-engine fighters for deep penetration.”