HariPrasad-1
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Messages
- 9,645
- Likes
- 21,138
Cursing power requirement shall be very very low compared to peak power. It may not be even half. Engine shall be used in maximum power configuration very few time in special circumstances.Well, it may be true about what you and I have mentioned about typical flight hrs of IAF pilot. This is what IAF pilots too say...
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/article2186466.ece
If we consider this 6000 hrs of flight time for one LCA means 60 years in service without any major overhaul which is very unlikely. I think IAF would take any thing from 3000 to 4000 hrs as what they have asked for in IOC.
As far as my calculation about fuel consumption and thrust is concerned, I may be wrong, but my calculations are very near to reality based on this outputs.
Minimum Thrust of GE F404 47 kN
Fuel consumption of GE F404 82.6 kg/kN h
https://defenseissues.wordpress.com/2014/12/06/fighter-aircraft-engine-comparision/
it implies that to produce minimum thrust of 47 kN for 1 hr it would consume 3882 kg of fuel. you could add or delete couple of hundred from this. So in clean configuration mode you can't expect Tejas to be in air for 1 hr in one sortie. Along with this if we club the average flight hrs of an IAF pilot, my projection of 185 hrs of Tejas flight time per year is a high probability.
But again we can only predict these things unless and until we get our hands on any official document.
Saab guys are using the GE variant with some 10% higher thrust engine. May be HAL wants that derivative for tejas.