- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,041
Thanks for sharing..
The problem of height of the pilot more than the pilot's seat surfaced only after the new Helmet mounted displays were introduced later. So no test pilot was in danger through out the ten year flight test program as some people are falsely trying to make out here.
compared to the pilot skull opening Mig-21s and Mig-27s which are faultily designed and unserviceable platforms that were routinely doing pilot skull opening duty in IAF a test pilot on LCA was ten times safer on TEjas PVs and LSPs .
Since the program is nearing completion you can find no paucity of IAF types and critics types to exploit any avenue to throw mud on the fighter.
ADA is refusing to entertain any media because most of the Indian defence journos are .... well less said the better......
Most of the TOI types are paid media who will continue to write shit about tejas regardless of what ADA says.Their understanding the complexities of a program like Tejas and it's profile is as good as their grasp of the profile of Katrina Kaif's profile they see on the screen.
Which agency in the world enjoy talking to this media whose only shit job is twisting quotes to suit their paymasters.look at the acrimony generated by the dumb Mig-21++ comment by even dumber IAF chief (which was never needed in the first place in an IOC ceremony) which did many rounds, while the same IAf chief saying it is just short of grippen NG when full testing is over ,a few minutes later was given a quite burial.
If anyone wants what is the real achievement of Tejas he can go to the following link and find it out in Teer's post in that page in answer to rant of the rats about LCA Tejas.
what's the Tejas' fundamental problem? - Page 3 - Key Publishing Ltd Aviation Forums