icecoolben
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2009
- Messages
- 472
- Likes
- 5
Rd-33, it would be excellent for Tejas also export potential, i is now.
The mig-35 wins the mmrca and we produce lots of batches of those rd-33 engines and our tejas would take off roaring from iaf airfields. The indigenous aircraft carrier would be cruising with 40 tejas fighters on its deck, making port calls to indian, pacific and the atlantic oceans. Attending fleet reviews at different countries. Showcasing the tejas in nigeria, indonesia, vietnam, bolivia greece all countries that would prefer our russian engined tejas than buy cheap russian engined chinese jets . Then our tejas sales will sour, russia will produce more and more rd-33 engines. Its a win-win situation.
If there was a light fighter competition when tejas and j-17 battle it hard out, wouldn't russia be tempted to field its mig-29s though twin-engined is still in in the light category . It would expose the major hole in both tejas and j-17. They have a foreign heart at their cores. If rosenbosxport plays a behind the scenes card that russia might with hold spares supply to engines of fighters supplied by india and china, wouldn't that be a win-win situation as well. But i ask for whom.
We indians have a stintch of loyalty in our blood unlike white men. I'm not being racist. Its western ideology brought forth by rennisance. Be it americans, french, english or the russians. Though Russians are not that business savvy as americans who proudly claim the business of america is business. They still look out for their own interests. Look at the political mileage moscow can offer that the new delhi can only dream off. Look at the french, they equipped their rafales with f404 during development, but instantly changed to m-88 though it had a lesser thrust than the ge414 in20 available then, thus they have been able to avoid american hegemony and field their fighters against gainsts lockheed and boeing in export competitions. They are highly respected for their sanction immune self-sustaining systems that offer foreign customers the reliability they expect from all weather defence supplier . So lets face it depending on russia would always be an unequal partnership and detriment to our own interests.
How does then india assert its autonomy? by going it alone, not likely. Lets put our foot down to tejas engine. Its a well known fact that our tejas has been integrated with ge f404 by following western engine computer integration laws and engine manufacturers of russia and west even the europeons seldom share technology. So it would be next to impossible to sucessfully integrate rd-33 with out major changes to the aircraft wirings and controls. Another issue is that the rd-33 measures 40 inches in diameter and length at more than 160 inches, but tejas's nozzle exit is designed for 35 inches dia, 154 inches length turbo-fan. Even if v sqeeze the engine there's a big problem the russian engine weights at 1143 kg heavier. so it takes larger space and also larger percent of aircraft weight. tejas is very small,compact with very light wings but not as rugged as an all metal plane. Using rd-33 might make the centre of gravity of tejas fuselage to fall in line with the engine it would present major problems then. So its best we go for ge 414 or better the ej-200 for the mk-2 atleast for the time being . Our military planners and politicians had envisaged such a situation. So they aspired the most difficult technological leap forward that was the GTRE kaveri after burning turbo-fan. Imagine the day kaveri was taken to russia in hopes that it would finally pass all tests and power production tejas models. But failure is an integral part of life . Just because the media fan fare has died down doesn't mean v should give up on it. The snecma-gtre proposal should be the stop gap measure. After achieving at least 90% of engine manufacture locally by 2016 tejas export can be pursued by then. The french have lost competitions due to low power of their engines compared to ej-200. But they were patient. Now they are confidient that m-88 is about to fruitify . The kaveri could well be our m-88 3 by then(by engine specifications too i mean). Lets put faith in our institutions than give in to chinese paranoia, shake hands with the russians, and pretend a false victory. The real victory would be when gtre and similar indian companies go economies of scale and engine every aircraft in indian fleet service. Be it civilian and military.
I agree with u the indians and russian working together would help keep the chinese away from the the light fighter market. With a russian proven engine and a gaurentee of future enhancement of the engine its an excellent proposition. We would be able to strategically capture the third world market also keep the chinese buying from the russians. While we would be licence producing them.RD-33MK engines for tejas??
India Defence Online reports India is seriously considering to use the Russian 33/RD-33MK engines for the homegrown Light Combat Aircraft, as it already used the Indian Air Force fleet of MiG-29 aircraft.
I have already wrote about this possibility in this blog early. I think, the allegedly selling of an uprated RD-93 engine to China and the current Indian activity around RD-33MK are two related events. Indeed, during some years (more than 5) Russia repeatedly refused to sell the RD- 33 variant with increased thrust to China. One possible reason for this – is the Indian pressure and the agreement between two nations for not allowing China to have more advanced weapons than India. The second one – Russia by self doesn't want China to be too assertive, so the weapons sold for China were always inferior in some degree relative to what Moscow sells to Delhi.
But the technological development is continuing. Sometimes you must run for keeping your place intact. Russia cannot refuse to sell 9 t RD-93 engine for China infinitely (till now it sold only 8.3 t thrust variant). It because the China copy WS-13 (with 7.8 t thrust) is gradually improved and becoming close in its characteristics to the regular RD-93. If Russia refuses now it will lose both the market and the leverage on China. So, the refusing loses its sense. Now the Russian engine manufacturers use Chines money for R&D, so India benefits from this situation too, since China in reality pays for India's advantage. Otherwise the price for new Russian engines, imported to India would be significantly higher.
It's not a secret, that India wants its Tejas light fighter will be more advanced than the Chinese fighter FC-1 (JF-17) of the same weight class. This advantage has not only a military but political and psychological aspect too. One of the most important and persuasive characteristic of a fighter is its engine. According to its thrust, reliability, service life can be made the conclusions about capability of the aircraft to take weapons and fight.
Thus, the current Indian preoccupation in seeking a more powerful engine for its indigenous Tejas project is well understood against the background of aggressive Chinese FC-1 marketing to India's neighbors. A more powerful engine with longer life could help Tejas mk.2 to take-off from the carrier deck, keep more payload and be more maneuverable in dogfight. Now installed GE F-404 engine isn't powerful enough, and the development of the indigenous Kaveri engine is too slow.
Till now two foreign engines were evaluated by India as candidates for Tejas mk.2: the European 90 kN EJ200 (EF-2000) and the American 98 kN GE F-414 (Super-Hornet). Only F-414 gives Tejas a decisive advantage over FC-1's RD-93 in thrust, although being slightly heavier. However, the airframe (inlets) rework is needed too for installation. 90 kN EJ200 has no significant advantage over RD-93 especially if the last is going to be uprated to 9 t = 88.2 kN. Furthermore, since the uprated variant of RD-93 is based on RD-33MK technologies, it must have service life close to 4.000 h. Whilst EJ200 according to some sources has only 2000 h life.
The Chinese were not allowed to produce RD-93, but they bought a repairing facility and technologies for repair. Thus they are unable to make a new RD-93 but theoretically still can try to 'overclock' RD-93 for even more thrust - 90-93 kN – however with expense of reducing life in some degree. In such a way they can have an engine with better than EJ200 tech characteristics for half a price. It can be the critical point for their FC-1 program export success. If they indeed, as was reported, are going to buy up to 500-1000 RD-93 engines with increased power, they are very serious in this aspect.
As my reason says me, the Indians tops could be now with the dilemma:
1) Going for the American 98 kN F-414 . Proved risk to be sanctioned in most unpredictable and hard situation. A totally new engine in IAF and IN inventory. However, could have some sense if F/A-18 wins MMRCA tender. Growing friction with US on nuclear issue makes this choice too risky and so – improbable.
2) 90 kN EJ200 – doesn't give any tech advantage for Tejas against it's main competitor and rival. According to my estimation could be as twice more costly than RD-33MK-based engine if recounted to lifespan. Theoretically can be sanctioned by each participant of this project (GB, Germany, Italy). Significantly reduces the export prospective of Tejas being too costly for potential LCA consumers in 3rd World.
3) RD-33MK variant with the bottom gear placement and a thrust vectoring nozzle (RD-133). Can be upgraded up to 10 t (98 kN) thrust in near future without changing the engine core. The Russian obligation to not sell TVN for China can be obtained, so the advantage of Tejas mk.2 engine (if chosen) can be visible and persuasive for public. The KLIVT all aspect TVN can be especially worth for the carrier based Tejas' variant now actively developed by HAL. The 8.3 t RD-33 ser.3 variant of the engine is already licensioned and ToTed in India, so only a minimal addition will be needed for RD-33MK production in India.
The last developments, the new contract for additional 29 MiG-29K\KUB and the Indian intention for purchasing more 50 Su-30MKI say Delhi has no any 'allergy' to Russian military stuff as some English-speaking writers hint in their publications. Therefore, even deeper cooperation can be predicted between India and Russia in military-industrial sphere, including common development. If RD-33MK chosen as a transitional engine for Tejas LCA (till Kavery ready), it's would be logically to use the Russian expertize for accelerated integration it into the redesigned LCA airframe. In most successful scenario we can reckon even a joint venture for accelerated LCA export for third countries with the Russian engine. This could have the framework of Brahmos program, when one side gives its almost ready project for joint revision and export, but keeping independence in domestic production. Only by this way the Indo-Russian tandem could compete with the aggressive Chinese marketing of its light fighters in 3rd World. For now Russia has no a project which could be an alternative to Chinese FC-1 fighter in light class.
The current development also raise the Russian chances to win MMRCA tender, since the opportunity for engine unification between IAF and the Navy on one already ToTed engine (RD-33) seams to be too attractive for refuse.
Defunct Humanity: RD-33 for Tejas?
The mig-35 wins the mmrca and we produce lots of batches of those rd-33 engines and our tejas would take off roaring from iaf airfields. The indigenous aircraft carrier would be cruising with 40 tejas fighters on its deck, making port calls to indian, pacific and the atlantic oceans. Attending fleet reviews at different countries. Showcasing the tejas in nigeria, indonesia, vietnam, bolivia greece all countries that would prefer our russian engined tejas than buy cheap russian engined chinese jets . Then our tejas sales will sour, russia will produce more and more rd-33 engines. Its a win-win situation.
If there was a light fighter competition when tejas and j-17 battle it hard out, wouldn't russia be tempted to field its mig-29s though twin-engined is still in in the light category . It would expose the major hole in both tejas and j-17. They have a foreign heart at their cores. If rosenbosxport plays a behind the scenes card that russia might with hold spares supply to engines of fighters supplied by india and china, wouldn't that be a win-win situation as well. But i ask for whom.
We indians have a stintch of loyalty in our blood unlike white men. I'm not being racist. Its western ideology brought forth by rennisance. Be it americans, french, english or the russians. Though Russians are not that business savvy as americans who proudly claim the business of america is business. They still look out for their own interests. Look at the political mileage moscow can offer that the new delhi can only dream off. Look at the french, they equipped their rafales with f404 during development, but instantly changed to m-88 though it had a lesser thrust than the ge414 in20 available then, thus they have been able to avoid american hegemony and field their fighters against gainsts lockheed and boeing in export competitions. They are highly respected for their sanction immune self-sustaining systems that offer foreign customers the reliability they expect from all weather defence supplier . So lets face it depending on russia would always be an unequal partnership and detriment to our own interests.
How does then india assert its autonomy? by going it alone, not likely. Lets put our foot down to tejas engine. Its a well known fact that our tejas has been integrated with ge f404 by following western engine computer integration laws and engine manufacturers of russia and west even the europeons seldom share technology. So it would be next to impossible to sucessfully integrate rd-33 with out major changes to the aircraft wirings and controls. Another issue is that the rd-33 measures 40 inches in diameter and length at more than 160 inches, but tejas's nozzle exit is designed for 35 inches dia, 154 inches length turbo-fan. Even if v sqeeze the engine there's a big problem the russian engine weights at 1143 kg heavier. so it takes larger space and also larger percent of aircraft weight. tejas is very small,compact with very light wings but not as rugged as an all metal plane. Using rd-33 might make the centre of gravity of tejas fuselage to fall in line with the engine it would present major problems then. So its best we go for ge 414 or better the ej-200 for the mk-2 atleast for the time being . Our military planners and politicians had envisaged such a situation. So they aspired the most difficult technological leap forward that was the GTRE kaveri after burning turbo-fan. Imagine the day kaveri was taken to russia in hopes that it would finally pass all tests and power production tejas models. But failure is an integral part of life . Just because the media fan fare has died down doesn't mean v should give up on it. The snecma-gtre proposal should be the stop gap measure. After achieving at least 90% of engine manufacture locally by 2016 tejas export can be pursued by then. The french have lost competitions due to low power of their engines compared to ej-200. But they were patient. Now they are confidient that m-88 is about to fruitify . The kaveri could well be our m-88 3 by then(by engine specifications too i mean). Lets put faith in our institutions than give in to chinese paranoia, shake hands with the russians, and pretend a false victory. The real victory would be when gtre and similar indian companies go economies of scale and engine every aircraft in indian fleet service. Be it civilian and military.