The most efficient way of making porkies kick the bucket is by
1.the current imran khan government are pussy lickers of the military.but in the next election I do not think imran will get any backing.so for some islamic fanatic mullah to become pak pm is not out of question.if a strong islamic rule is imposed pakistan will be more down in economic development.
2.the CPEC project is gonna be a boon to india as even if the project is completed insurgencies will make sure that the chinese will be in their own version of Afghanistan.attacks on CPEC will also deter future projects by any company on pakistan.
3.pakistan's constant race with india in military terms will also be their downfall as if india adapts one system pakis will need another to counter it.but unlike pakistan indian economy also grows with the defence budget.
4.chinese monopoly on the paki market will be a
grave danger as competition in the market ensures fair prices and quality.but if chinese companies have monopoly pakis will have to pay what chinese companies ask them.
5.pakistan is sitting on a neighborhood that is highly unstable if war broke out in iran or Afghanistan people will be swarming as refugees to pakistan.
6.pakis thinking economic development will come when CPEC is done are dead wrong.with 58% literacy and girls not getting education who will be workforce.india has strong education system where boys and girls are educated and this work force will fuel indian economy for the future.
Agree with all of your points. My belief is that we should be careful about point 5 as well. When Pak collapses, either due to lack of water or something else, 200 million radicalised muzzies will try to cross our border. Iran is not possible due to the Baloch Deserts, and Afg is not possible due to the mountainous KP. I hope GOI has a plan for that, and seizing their nukes when the time comes.
Disagree with point 1 though. Imran Khan is good for us. He has successfully managed to crash their economy, place the country into chinki hands, destroy the local market, and make a laughing stock out of Pak. A cleric's rule would probably be similar to Zia-ul-Haq. Radicalization and diplomatic isolation might increase, but the economy might come back. Zia, to all of his deficits, did a good job with their economy, maybe a little worse than Musharraf. The reason he was bad was due to the radicalization he started, the military-civilian govt interference and the Afghan wars.