Still has some loopholes like why would any hindu want jew captives (nariman house) and mysterious case of karkare. If you can debunk these 2 things as well.
The ISI was trying to make it look like a botched up operation undertaken by Hindu organizations which were trying to defame Muslims. Basically, this was a false flag OF a false flag operation.
The theme of the sickular story is "Hindus were trying to do a false flag attack to blame Muslims by killing Christians and Jews, but when the culprit's identity was revealed, he turned out to be a Hindu, and the grand Hindu conspiracy was exposed".
Congress had hatched a full fledged plan with ISI to blame the RSS. As per their plan, Kasab was never meant to be caught alive, but Ombale sacrificed his life to catch him alive and the truth came out leaving Congress to cook up all sorts of fairytales to save their asses. As to why the Congress was working in tandem with ISI to defame Hindus (in 26/11 and Ishrat Jahan case) is anyone's guess. They were facing tough questions from Indians about their appeasement policies and soft stance on terror, so they wanted to create this bogey of 'saffron terror' to shame Hindus into silence. If their plan had succeeded, then every time a terror attack took place in the future, they would have said "terror has no religion, we don't know who did it, it could be Hindu terrorists too, let us investigate and find out" and the investigation would go on for 10 years and real terrorists would never be caught and the Congress vote bank would be safe.
This way, all terrorists (who conspicuously ALWAYS belong to the same religion), would get a free pass, by downplaying the Muslim angle by creating a fake 'Saffron angle' to confuse people. Even during the Mumbai Blasts in 1993, when Sharad Pawar was the CM of Maharashtra, he planted a false story in the news papers saying that some blasts also happened in Muslim majority areas, to confuse people as to the source of the blast. He has himself admitted it, see :
To keep the peace, I misled people on ’93 blasts: Pawar
Here is why Sharad Pawar lied on the day Mumbai was bombed by Dawood Ibrahim
Karkare's case was no different than Ombale or Unnikrishnan, he was a martyr who died fighting the terrorists. All reports suggesting he was killed by his own team are the products of a fertile Congress brain trying to deflect the matter. This is not without precedent, they have done it before, in fact, they do it every time they are caught on the backfoot. Do you remember there was a shootout in Delhi where some terrorists were killed and a police officer died? Even that time Congress was playing the trumpet that the police was killed by Hindu moles within the police department. Turned out to be fake.
It is a small little trick which Indian school kids use during exams called "if you can't convince them, then confuse them". Remember when we don't know the right answer during exams then we start writing all sorts of crap? it's the same strategy Congress is using. They know they are lying, so they cook up and propagate multiple narratives to confuse people.
Even during the Ishrat Jahan case, they tried the same trick of obfuscation.
First they said, "no no, Ishrat was not a terrorist, she was just a normal secular girl".
Now after evidence of a massive coverup by Chidambaram has been unearthed, they are saying "okay, well, maybe...just mayyybee, she was a terrorist, but so what? she was just going to do some small blast, she wasn't sent to kill Modi."
5 years later when there will be court convictions in the case and IB, RAW officers who collaborated with Chidambaram and Sonia will go to jail, then presstitutes will say "Okay, mayyybe, she was a terrorist sent to kill Modi, but we can still disagree with the courts
(sic Nidhi Razdan)"
5 more years later they will say "Okay so mayybe we have been proved to be total frauds who covered up a terror plot, so what? that was 20 years ago, how long are we going to dwell in the past?"
They did the same trick with 2002 Godhra train incident.
Narrative 1 : It wasn't an act of terror, the fire was accidentally started by Hindu saints who were cooking inside train.
Few months later,
Narrative 2: Maybe the fire was not started by the saints, but we don't know who started it.
Few months later,
Narrative 3 : Okay, so mayybe some outsider threw a petrol bomb on the train, but we don't know for sure that the attackers were Muslims, could be Hindu goons too
Few months later,
Narrative 4 :Okay, so there is evidence to show that the attackers were Muslim, so what? does that justify the riots?
Few months later,
Narrative 5 :Okay, turns out, even the riot was started by Muslims, so what? the justice system should be blind to religion, we are all Indians first. Stop communalizing the issue.
By this time, 12 years have passed and Hindu public has forgotten the facts (but Muslim public ends up believing the media narrative that Muslims are being victimized in India), and presstitutes are back to peddling other lies like Col Purohit, Aseemanand, Asaram Babu. 10 years later, even these stories will turn out to be false. Only one thing will remain the same, Media is never going to give up their secular Jihad and Dhindus will never learn anything!
The media continues to fabricate more events to be used as moral justification for Jihad (sic) (Masood became terrorist because of Babri), at the same time our national security ecosystem slips from bad to worse. I am sure there is going to be a terror attack in the name of Dadri and presstitutes will justify that too, the groundwork has already been laid.
But we can all take solace in the fact that Islam is a religion of peace, I shudder to think what it would be like if it weren't a religion of peace.