The Hindu : International : Pakistan: India has not given enough material against Saeed
Nirupama Subramanian
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan appears to have taken the firm position that India has the responsibility of providing it with the evidence to enable it to take action against Hafiz Saeed, founder of the Lashkar-e-Taiba which is blamed for the November 2008 Mumbai attacks.
India has sought action against Mr. Saeed as part of its larger demand that Pakistan must move to dismantle the “terrorist infrastructure” on its soil.
But Pakistan is increasingly tying action against him to evidence directly implicating him in the planning and facilitation of the Mumbai attacks.
Foreign Office spokesman Abdul Basit said on Thursday that New Delhi’s replies to Pakistan’s latest questions were “not really enough” to proceed legally against the Jamat-ud-Dawa leader.
However, the questions that Pakistan asked did not specifically relate to Mr. Saeed but to the nitty-gritty of the Mumbai investigation.
In a dossier to New Delhi days before the Sharm-al-Shaikh meeting of the two prime ministers, Pakistan detailed the steps it had taken to bring the Pakistani perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks to book, including registering cases against Lashkar-e-Taiba members.
Additionally, it sought certified statements from officials involved in various aspects of the investigation, plus the interrogation statements of two Indians accused in the attacks, Sabhauddin and Fahim Ansari.
This is what India gave Pakistan last week. But first in India and later in Pakistan, these replies to specific information requests from Pakistan got confused, thanks to the media in both countries, with the Hafiz Saeed case.
As a result, the message that went down from the latest round of dossier diplomacy is that India wants Pakistan to act against the JuD leader on the basis of the information provided last week.
At the weekly Foreign Office briefing, Mr. Basit said in response to a question that in the Hafeez Saeed case, Pakistan was proceeding in accordance with its own laws.
“But the material [contained in the dossier handed over by India last week] apropos Hafiz Saeed is not really enough and it does not strengthen our hands to proceed legally against him,” Mr. Basit said.
On Wednesday, Interior Minister Rehman Malik told Parliament that the JuD was among the 25 groups proscribed in Pakistan. But it appears the group has not been formally banned under Pakistan’s anti-terrorism law; it has been barred from functioning as a charity organisation.
Last week, the Supreme Court adjourned the case against Mr. Saeed indefinitely, and though petitions, one each from the Punjab provincial government and the federal government against Mr. Saeed are pending before the court, it is not known if or when these will be taken up again.
But the Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Pakistan had registered cases against five suspects and “we will make sure — on that count we are moving forward.”
The proceedings against the five are in the pre-trial stages in an anti-terrorism court. Charges are yet to be formally framed against them.
Another suspect held
Meanwhile, Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Authority is reported to have arrested one more suspect on Tuesday. According to Daily Times, the FIA’s Special Investigations Unit arrested Jamil Ahmed of Battagram in the North-West Frontier Province.
His name is said to have come up during interrogation of the other five suspects, who include the Lashkar-e-Taiba operations commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and a communication expert of the group, Zarar Shah.
In addition, the FIA is looking for 13 proclaimed offenders in the case.
The Foreign Ministry spokesperson said the two sides were working out dates for a meeting between the Foreign Secretaries as agreed upon at Sharm-al-Shaikh. The Foreign Secretaries would then report to the Foreign Ministers, who are expected to meet on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly in September.
“We hope there will be a movement towards a sustained dialogue, towards resuming the composite dialogue,” the spokesperson said.
There was a recognition even in India that the Kashmir issue had to be resolved for lasting peace in the region, and this could be done only through dialogue and engagement, he said. Co-operation between the countries could only come after bilateral disputes were resolved, he added.