Once you bring foreign populations, the original character is lost. it's not a surprise why newyork and california behave the way they do, they are a melting pot.
for ex: if texas continues to open up for tech, we might see the an end to open carry policy in a decade or two.
Mass Immigration as Military Action Against an Opponent
During World War 2, one of the things Nazi Germany did was to “colonize” both France and Poland with German settlements. After the war this was brought up as one of the atrocities Germany committed.
In the Soviet Union, one of the things Stalin did was move ethnicities around, isolating them, and turning them into Russians. For example, moving Ukrainians into Russia proper, and moving Russians into areas that were formerly majority Ukrainian, reducing the area of majority-Ukranian land and, because Ukranians are white, converting Ukranians into Russians inside Russia by isolating them from any other Ukranians.
Until very recently, Israel supported and supplied settlements in Judea-Samara / The West Bank. These were Jewish settlements in a majority-Muslim area. This was considered a “human rights violation” by the United Nations.
ISIS, which has operations in Libya, has stated that part of their strategy is to promote mass immigration to Europe – both Middle Eastern / North African and black African. The idea is that this will destabilize Europe.
Gaddafi, just before the NATO air strikes on Libya which, in conjunction with the anti-Gaddafi “rebels” on the ground, ultimately overthrew him, Gaddafi threatened to send millions of black Africans to Europe, saying he would turn Europe black unless they gave him 4 billion Euros. He correctly saw mass migration in military terms.
When the Chinese began mass importing of Chinese into Tibet, the whole world recognized this as an aggressive military act – independent of the invasion that occurred back in 1950. Like with the Israeli settlements, there were protests saying to “free Tibet” in response to mass Chinese immigration.
Similarly, when the League of Nations condemned Japan’s actions in Manchuria, part of the list of grievances against Japan was Japanese settlements in both Manchuria and Korea.
When the Turks settled the then-majority-Greek areas of eastern Anatolia, including Constantinople, that was seen at the time as a terrible tragedy by Europe. And the settlement of Bulgaria and Serbia with Turks was also seen as a form of immolation of those countries.
Lets say you want to bring a Kenyan into France. What is the outcome of this? Ignoring the likely net economic cost of the Kenyan to France, the result is that Kenya is still 100% Kenyan, while France now has a Kenyan in it, who can vote. Send in a million, and now Kenya has 2% control of France, but retains 100% control of Kenya.
The reality is that mass immigration is a form of warfare against whoever you are immigrating against.