Compersion
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 2,253
- Likes
- 911

its ironic that the definition of PRC role in Tibet and nearby is moving more towards temporary traders and pure economics.
pullback when it does not suit them economically and if challenged. retreat inland.
perhaps that is what Nehru (not vouching) had in mind - "temporary" - that is in some areas it can be short and in other, it can be hybrid and it other places it can be with two different status and ... in another can be subject to ideology. perhaps it was to demonstrate no ill feeling to demonstrate equality (some might say misplaced).
Perhaps it was the insecurity of PRC. Removing this by teaching Nehru a lesson where they felt they were being dismissed as unimportant. that establishment of that fear (insecurity) probably still holds true. the truth that bharat developed and advanced the chinese. the truth that people from bharat (not only nehru) advanced the chinese (* from centuries to recent).
There were 10+ Soviet republics at one time. There is Taiwan. There is Hong Kong, Macau, There is Tibet. There is China Town in New York and Sydney.
What 1962 does is not answer any question at all. Today discussion on 1962 is not the same to earlier for both parties. But we can take a stand and continue for generations. The Chinese are pragmatic. Bharat is awakening.
Jammu and Kashmir: can be seen into different pieces that include Siachen, Ladakh, Balistan, Srinagar, Jammu, Shaksgam Valley, Aksai Chin, etc, etc.
Tibet: can be seen in different pieces that include ...
Linked but on a much wider scope:Bharat has welcomed many to seek enlightenment. many come and do. a few come and cause trouble. they are shown their wrong ways.
Don't want to make it seen and seem to boast and not being humble. far from that.
pullback when it does not suit them economically and if challenged. retreat inland.
perhaps that is what Nehru (not vouching) had in mind - "temporary" - that is in some areas it can be short and in other, it can be hybrid and it other places it can be with two different status and ... in another can be subject to ideology. perhaps it was to demonstrate no ill feeling to demonstrate equality (some might say misplaced).
Perhaps it was the insecurity of PRC. Removing this by teaching Nehru a lesson where they felt they were being dismissed as unimportant. that establishment of that fear (insecurity) probably still holds true. the truth that bharat developed and advanced the chinese. the truth that people from bharat (not only nehru) advanced the chinese (* from centuries to recent).
There were 10+ Soviet republics at one time. There is Taiwan. There is Hong Kong, Macau, There is Tibet. There is China Town in New York and Sydney.
What 1962 does is not answer any question at all. Today discussion on 1962 is not the same to earlier for both parties. But we can take a stand and continue for generations. The Chinese are pragmatic. Bharat is awakening.
Jammu and Kashmir: can be seen into different pieces that include Siachen, Ladakh, Balistan, Srinagar, Jammu, Shaksgam Valley, Aksai Chin, etc, etc.
Tibet: can be seen in different pieces that include ...

Linked but on a much wider scope:Bharat has welcomed many to seek enlightenment. many come and do. a few come and cause trouble. they are shown their wrong ways.
Don't want to make it seen and seem to boast and not being humble. far from that.
Last edited: