Search results

Hey you are making personal comments because nobody can hand you an infarction?

Where were you hiding all these days? Thanks fulcrum. Lets lever out everyone mate

Slowly Trying to get me do the dirty and difficult job eh ppgj? Thats the whole point. When there is nothing told about Tejas AOA how can we logically discuss it. Most of the posts here are assumptions. This will happen in future,this will fly by 2016, that will be ready by 2014. We just have...

I say --- 1. Mark 1 is a tech demonstrator. Confine it to the ADA labs. Validate and improve on it. Well done to the scientists 2. Immediately cease all plans to induct Mark 1. Its a waste of time energy and budget and focus and human resources. 3. Get the Mark 2 to fly by end of 2012. Make...

Sir-- Please-- we are talking of LCA as it is now. We would have been proud if it had been used to validate technology. Not thrust on IAF. Your optimism stems from what will happen in the future.. Of course it is good to be optimistic. But have a balance please. LCA AOA? WHY ARE TALKING OF...

I apologise unreservedly for the comment. Sorry.

Typical desi looking at the neighbours plate

You don't want pilots to loose lives,you want to win potential wars,you want to to blow the enemy out of the skies,you want to touch the sky with glory but you want to induct Mark 1 which is still short of air staff requirements even with FOC. Ok go ahead. But kindly let me disagree. Even in...

I hope the moderator has taken note of this and I expect some action against this. I am restrained.

I never said Mig 21 is better than LCA. I have said in my previous posts almost 12 months ago that Mark 1 will be a refined version of Mig 21. IAF doesn't have any problem with LCA? Are you trying to reinvent the wheel? Take a break have a kit kat. You have lost the plot.

Sub par immature platforms in IAF and corruption in defence deals. What can I say ? pick your choice: an unfortunate co-incidence OR a deadly combination. I will make it very easy for you. show me one article in the last 6 months which does not talk of major shortcomings in Tejas.

Great!!! another excuse for ADA !!!! There is a complete silence on indian AESA. They will probably turn around and say we need another 10 years as we haven't developed one before. I cannot believe India still sucks up to USA with US completely blocking our way through back door politics.

You are sitting in the US and questioning my national pride? How much more pseudo can you get? Talk of double standards. You are very proud of IAF having to unwillingly accept Mark 1 planes which even with FOC (said to be about 2 years away in ADA language which means a minimum 3 years away)...

Please Don't jump out of nowhere and keep asking for proof. Follow all the posts carefully where the deficiencies of mark 1 has been debated. If you are not aware that Mark 1 does not fulfill and falls short of airs taff requirements in all major areas you shouldn't be asking any questions at...

Read post 1360. Growth into a matured platform in testing not in service. NEVER. you induct mature platforms into service. You don't induct planes into service and mait for them to mature. What is it with you guys??? I mean are you all "AYE" sayers trying to derail the IAF??

I am sorry that you may have had done enough projects in science but you had a very poor English teacher. Show me one post where I have said the program's R and D must not continue on the side lines? All I am asking is for Mark 1 not be inducted. If you don't want IAF to say this you will decide...

Induction most definitely does not mean support and support does not mean induction. End user(read IAF) Supporting a program in R and D does not mean end user accepting the end product. iaf SUPPORTED lca BY SETTING UP A COMMITTEE, giving pilots and feedback for development. You said it your...

Self reliance does not mean inducting a 3++ plane into an unwilling airforce

support does not mean induction

lca mark 2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx