Search results

Why not drop the Tejas MK2 and make a single engine variant of AMCA? Sent from my Redmi 4 using Tapatalk

To make AMCA possible we need lot of experience in making it truly 5th generation fighter. First we need is a basic air frame with no sensors or any thing just to prove its capabilities. Second we add can rope in french or israel for the sensors,data processing and sensor fusion Once the plane...

Why this DRDO idiots put all this research which is done by tax payers money on internet. Every one can see it including pakis and the copycat chinese.

AMCA total length is 17.20 meters which is longer than F-35 and equal to Chinese J-31 and shorter than SU-57 & J-20

No one gives anything just like that there will always be quid-pro-quo. Rafale is not fifth generation,it uses afterburner to supercruise. For fifth generation stealth mean thermal too so we need engine that can deliver enough power without supercruise.

Lockheed Martin F-22: RFP issued in October 1986 and prototype done by 1991 and first flight in 1997 and introduction to Air force in 2005.....Total 10 years for first flight and 20 years for induction. F-35: Development contract singed in November 1996....In 2001 X-35 was awarded...

As expected even 2030 not enough for our lazy assholes.

It is a targeting pod like...litening pod from Israel. or electronic warfare pod.

Do AMCA had Electro-optical targeting system(EOTS) which is found on f-35 and chinese j-20?

Not just f-16 most pf western fighters had a side control stick........................

Where we are at the AMCA development..? Here is S.Korea fifth generation fighter development

If we can get 125 Kn of engine by any means..that would be fantastic for AMCA program

That means no more f-16 or f-18 discussions and French rafales got another shot

Yews i will agree with you...engineering became just a namkevasthe

Yes that's what they are proposing..for AMCA as well as single engine jet.... That's disaster if we build AMCA in foreign owned line..

Next generation facilities...like F-35 building line

There would be no life span for fighter jets in hours....They look is how the airframe condition is...they overhaul to maintain the flying condition..if every one follows flying hours then our IAF will have less than 300 planes by right now..

No..fighter jet life cycle is about 30 years with upgrades..but engine life span max of 3000-4000 hours You need to replace new engines once old completes it's life span

Assistance...i think they will give a screw drive job for sure..because if we can mature in 5G jet they will loose business

Your reply gave me some relief........