Search results

:lol: Who are Armand's other IDs?

Is this idiot talking to himself?

Isn't this a J-20 thread? Why are people arguing about the Liaoning aircraft carrier? Also, @p2prada is making some pretty deep assumptions about Chinese aircraft development behind his arguments. For example, he assumes that the J-15 simply cannot takeoff at MTOW from the Liaoning, when the...

Where is the source?

There's official news surrounding a Su-33 purchase? Source?

True--the main reason the US switched to the FA-18 from the F-14 was that they could pack more fighters with a smaller jet, while not substantially sacrificing combat capability. The PLAN may be able to do the same with the J-31 vs the J-15, if they can put better C4ISR, weaponry, and avionics...

FYI, the reason the fuselage is larger is because it has internal weapons bays (the same kind the F-35 and F-22 use to maintain stealth). For that reason, a large part of the increased fuselage volume is empty space. The fact that @Armand2REP doesn't know this makes me question his supposed...

I know those F-35 pics are photo-chopped for a fact. Everyone knows the F-35 is lagging behind, it will not enter service before Russia finishes designing and building the PAK FA and selling it to our glorious IAF for a 100% markup. Nothing you or any other Chini/Paki bastard says can make me...

Refusing to change your beliefs in the face of verified facts is an example of delusional psychosis. How do you know the J-20 hasn't had its state acceptance trials yet? And what's more, aren't those trials confidential? Why does the PLAAF need to release confidential testing data to satisfy...

He won't. The way I see it, we can use @Armand2REP to build up our patience, for the day when we have three-year-olds who keep asking why the sky is blue.

Well, the pictures you put up don't look like photoshops either. The blurred edges look identical. What's more, the positions and relative orientations of each sensor on the multiple angles are all the same. If someone were to photoshop it, the positioning should vary from picture to picture...

FYI, that's called a compression artifact, not pixelated evidence of photoshopping. Compression artifact - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That's because it's a JPG file. JPG files re-encode themselves after every save and load, so there will be noisy edges around every shape. Look at the edges around the PLAAF logo on the tail of the aircraft: Are you going to say that someone photoshopped that onto it as well?

I don't see any pixelation. Maybe you could blow up a few screenshots?

That's a prop at a defense exhibit from 24 months ago. How does that tell you what radar is going into the J-20?

There will always be doubters, just ignore them. 大人不记小人过

Oh christ, cut it out man.

Why do you need to know?