Search results

I have some reservations on long range SAM's .By making larger kill radius how do we keep the kill probability high(i feel larger the distance lesser is the kill probability).Can ARM work for a wide bandwidth ( i am still not sure). In akash even if u take out the battery-level radar the Central...

So my assumption was correct .PAD would be overkill . I think using Aesa would reduce number of radars used by a battery.Now they have communication centre , Battery level radar and battery level survillence radar.Will Aesa make it a single radar and probably we have one extra reserve .throw me...

Using PAD for aeroplanes would be over kill . Hope it can be used for it as well . The interceptors in ABM would be faster than conventional SAM's .What u guys say? Cheers Prabhu.G

Hi I have suggestion to make.I felt we lag in sensor's in this case active/semi active radar seeker r IR image seeker.Is there something done for this ? Cheers Prabhu.G

Man!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Forget p**** .I really don't worry about them .Tunguska's and igla's are enough to defend our airspace .Even pechoras are more sophisticated to them.Chin*** are hidden dragons ????

But I felt our defense forces are looking at two layered cover .One with active seeker and other with command guided.For lethal force "Today's antiradiation missile are far more sophisticated and can engage targets at longer distances as well" Cheers Prabhu.G

Hi Shash, Does Aesa means less jamming and more targets to be tracked? Will aesa radars will make it less vulnerable to Anti -Radiation missiles? And is there any idea of making it work without BLR. Cheers Prabhu.G

So it means Mk-II doesn't have active seeker and it's going to be command guided