Search results

Kunal, tehre is no depper sens in mesurement trning munition ;) Yours pictures shown trening munitoon or partial model whit top part of the SABOt only. So nice photos, but rather not possible to use in mesurments.

And here is funny :-) If bal holder is 520mm long (draw) then our "x" (crew hole witdth) is 320mm (small) and our "y" is 340mm.

So including slopped we have for lenght relatio: bar : x : y 1 : 0.619 : 0.661 or in theory when we included slopped bar lenght: 0.992 : 0.619 : 0.661

Greate but crew hatch and LOS for armour after main sight are not very well marked. There is error since first draw :) I will try to mark on pgoto about what I think

About this:

520mm you mooron... jesus, you even cant't read simple value!

First - I alwayes said that it was 520mm Second - look post above

It depend beetwen what points we will masure "hight" of hath. In fact this what I had posted above is only "inner diameter" of crew hath.

But You did this in completly wrong way. :) When is ending armour inside turret is visible on interiot pictures. Turret roof periscope(vision blokc) is good indicator. So it's possible to count this "from the outside". In fact all your mesurments are worth shit becouse you have error on circa...

It's very good acually. I check this myself for: 6° 7° 8° and 500 and 550mm hath width. The result is between 315 and circa 350mm LOS behind main sight. So again - the result are quite possible for Yours, my and Dejawolf job :)

@up and result is circa 330-340mm LOS -yes? :)

They are 3 proofs why Arjun Mk.I LOS after main sight is circa 320-350mm max, and why ersakthivel is wrong in this thema: 1. @pmaitra obseravation whit prooper angle 8° More or less @pmaitra obseravation whit prooper angle 8° degree (or 7°) give us result: It's slopped at exatly 8°...

It's slopped at exatly 8 so maybe 0.638201 x 0.990 = 0.63181899 So maybe 500mm x 0.63181899 = 315mm Is this correct pmaitra? ps. if it's slopped at 6° or 7° then result will be circa 320mm. So exatly as Dejawolf job, and my own mesurment usinf bal holder lenght.

Whit full respect for your job - the orange arrows are on wrong angle, the perspective have some minor porblem there too :-) Idea: just use "bar holder" lenght. Cut it and remove :)

This explain all: here is visible whole cavity

:bplease: two dimension visible from Arjun draw and eight on Leo-2A4 factory draw is indeed "no dimensions" :rofl: You have four draws whit compare Leo-2A4 and Arjun draw. One whit turrets only (and yes, Arjun turret is no longer is it's main part then leo-2A4 turret), and 3 other draws -...

:facepalm: no it's not. No single of your ideas is correct: Both draw in the same scale (I had rescaled Arjun draw to the same scale as Leo-2A4 draw.). And Yes, in arjun end of backplate is in the same place when in Leo-2 is additional turret roof periscope for loader. But...

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/land-forces/208-main-battle-tanks-armour-technology-369.html here you have about CAWA armour on tank