Search results

Becouse you ----in idiot there is indeed no explosion of internal ammunition. Even in Merkava Mk.IV hit its stupid ammo layout there was no explosion of internal ammunition after even 100kg IED. KIA in tank WIA in takn but no explosion of internal ammunition becouse moder ammo is ignit ussaly...

Don't be funny. IED and mines are one of lightes things for tnaks on battlefield. Mine under track? Shit happens. IED - well in conventional war there is no time for IED. Sorry -your post is pointless, and you haven't any idea about tanks on battlefield.

Well -it's seems that You pretend to be "bullshit generator" on DFI... [

Hej men - . I wrote here a lot about Lebanon and Mekravas. Don't wrote bullshit in this thema. Mark IV losses: 1. 24th july - one Mk.IV hit by heavy ATGM (ner Bin Jubalij) TK- KIA, two - WIA 2. the same - one Mk.IV on BIG IED one KIA 6 WIA 0. 3th August - TK KIA (after big ATGM hit in turret...

Akim, it wasn't old S-125 Neva? Are You sure about SA-6?? As I know it was S-125...

Yes, becouse those F-117 was shoot down no by S-300 or "Kolczuga" but for ordinary old S-125 Newa and old ordinary P-18 radar but whit lower frequency. 3 radars after little tuning and we have reflected radar so strong to "cath" "stelath" 117. There is no stealth planes. All is relevant...

But it's impossible situation on battlefield. And how many ATGMs squad survive SPH fire? Did You ever read about artilery fire? I did. I must to known that-so yes, I know. What if those battery wil placed smoke on battlefield and tanks go trought area? Sorry life is not so simple. BTW: For...

BUAHAHAHAHAHAH In Air Force wet dream maybe. The truth was far worse for flying cowboys -few examples about this: 1. In April/May 1991 one US Study Group about the effectiveness of air strikes became and study 163 "destroyed" Iraq tanks from division: -Tawalkana - 12 Tk.Div - 3 Tk Div. 78...