Search results

  1. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    I know, sorry for that. bullshit, bullshit, bullshit Sory for being rude. Armour coud be very possible couse the same idea (+ Pakistani have opurtinies to copied T-80UD armour, and IA what "pattern" have?) Mobility in Al-Chalid is very good couse ukrainian power-pack - in other way "if any"...
  2. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    No thanks! Poland is now leopard-2A4 and 2A5 user, and nobody here want's use soviet-style tanks ;) BTW: Polish PT-91MZ (Malayesia) is in most aspects better then erly T-90S and Indian T-90S, only the main armour is worse. So rather polish army and industry have good compare between this what...
  3. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Nope, I understand perfectly. IA hasn't choice in 2000s couse Arjun program falitures. And IA must buy tanks somwhere. Obvious choice was T-90S whit hull preatty close to T-72M1 Aleya,and almoust the same supply and manuals. And Indian security (which was IMHO the key for the world security as...
  4. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    So You can't win war in circa 1000 T-90S but on ~240 Arjun it will be possible? C'mon.. In what way "cannot even work". 99% of those problems can be rapair by simple modernisation. Just FCS and AC system, and APU maybe. That's all -it's not hight tech... (exept FCS) If there are some problems...
  5. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    and don't blame T-90S tank. It's exatly that tank what was needed by IA. You got quality on cost level IMHO. And I suppose that: a) thre was no third option for IA in whole 2000s. - T-72M1 made "base" and it's supply simmilar to T-90S so whole think was cheper for IA. b) T-90S is guite good...
  6. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    So in other way: good marketing and sales menageres in Russia :) And this trade whit so many problems for IA was possible only thanks to pointles and too long Arjun program. In fact Arjun is developing since when -1980s? And what result? Buing T-72M1 Aleya. Ok, Arjun is still developing in...
  7. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    So in this very short note is mistake. Indian industry was unable to produce this antena before got technology from Poland. Those antenas are produce in Poland, so there was no single resons to bought them in India. Now India developed their own family radars based on mixed orginal polish...
  8. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    BTW: After ask some friends in Poland: those antenas sent to Poland was offset. We sold licence to India, and as offset polish PIT must bought sevral antena made in India. They are sevral difrenses between pure polish antena and Indian ones, it was caused by technology resons (difrencess between...
  9. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    I don't think soo. In Poland was build the same 3x (TRS-15), after obtaining money from Indian contract, there was build improved version 8 x NUR-15M plus 2x TRS-15C Odra-C for Polish NSM (Naval Strike Missile (NSM) divison: So at least 13 radars TRS/NUR-15 familiy where build in Poland, not...
  10. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    You don't understand. Those antena and article showns that 2001 antena "SUPPLIES WAVEGUIDE ANTENNA TO POLAND -" was first biuld in India after giving the Polish PIT licenses, and this short article shown that important fact. It just means that technology transfer from Poland to India was...
  11. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    It's very simple. It's first build antena in India mande on polish lincence, from RADWAR (PIT) :) Stacja radiolokacyjna TRS-15 / NUR-15 Odra - DziennikZbrojny.pl Resuume: In 1996 indian MoD ask polish PiT about help in Indian air defence developmend. India was interested mostly in...
  12. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Of course here is some error, but what is obvious: 1) Thickest Arjun turret width is less then 3m - it's (whit some error range) between 2,82 -2,95m 2) on crews hatches hight turret width is between 2,32 -2,44m 3) after main sight there is 350-370mm space for armour ant not more. 4) front...
  13. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    So what is the asnwer? :)
  14. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Btw -if this luncher have really thick barrel (3mm) then we have 3mm + 81mm + 3mm = 87mm and You are circa 1,88 tall IMHO. Of course they willbe some error in mesurment. OK, now im really puzzled - how really You are hight? :) Im just crusious how big error is. BTW: Consider the fact that...
  15. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    OK, so in theory whole luncher have 2mm + 81mm + 2mm = 85mm at least or 86mm Hmm are You so tall? 1,84-1,87m
  16. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    C'mon im puzzled how wrong was my mesurment made in 3min whit one in theory real diamension (81mm smoke granades so circa 85mm thick luncher) but on fast and without any checking. BTW: If I only had Arjun wheel diamater or other on sure data...
  17. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    1,874cm? I have not problem whit scaling but whit Arjun smoke granades caliber* :-/ * Ajrun has circa 81mm caliber smoke granades, but mesurment "luncher" of smoke granaders must have correst for some "barrel thickens" of those luncher. Per analogy to leo-2 it can be circa 85mm cal for 81mm...
  18. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    IMHO The men on photo have circa 1,78-1,84cm The answer can be on PM :) Correct?
  19. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    what caliber has smoke granades? 83mm? 81mm?
  20. militarysta

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    And this what doing here? OT & Spam 1. Find smth well known 2. Post it in random topic whithout any sens and logic example: posting about "M1A2 SEP: Additional Background" in topic about Indian Armored Vehicles 3. Be happy forum spammer and troll Well done!
Top