Search results

  1. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    My article about deep cold war, and....why modern 105mm APFSDS are not storng enought. Twardy pancerz, czyli czy czołg zawsze wybucha po trafieniu. Cz. VII - T-72 i Smok, a sprawa polska - DziennikZbrojny.pl If any question ask here -I know -article in polish but google trnaslator...
  2. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    @UP Nope. Chassis of the Armata will be look like this: turret will be simmilar to this: BUT It will be fully unmaned, without turret bustle - obly whit small bustle for autoloader part. Turret armour will give Armata shape like in Ob.640 turret.
  3. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Unfortunatly it will be polish only... Rather any posible solution which allowed to achive bigger MJ energy transfered to target. So in theory as big as it's possible MJ energy transfered for as small as it's possible area cm2 on target. To complicated more - penetrator must overpass some...
  4. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    • Zobacz dziaÅ‚ - Militarium in English -part in english, rather for ask and answers It's typical sword-shield next step :) More or less it's seems that tank armour since 1980s ussaly have small advantage over "sword". In case energy level those 11-13MJ is for penetrator and sabot...
  5. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Two articles written by myself about ukrainian ERA Knife: part I: UkraiÅ„ski pancerz reaktywny Nóż. Część I. Klasyczne pancerze reaktywne ERA oraz metody ich pokonywania jako punkt odniesienia do analizy Noża - DziennikZbrojny.pl part II: UkraiÅ„ski pancerz reaktywny Nóż. Część II –...
  6. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    In Poland we have small problem whit militarium forum, now it's only fo register users, soon it shoud be open for wide public. Please be patient ;-)
  7. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    In case influence of the non-penetrating hits on tank it's multiple problem. In case tanks whit solid steel (monolith) armour - cast steel or RHA plates - the problem was transfering MJ energy from outern (hit) surface to inter (border of crew comparment) layers. Even if there was...
  8. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Back to Life! :D Give me some time, I will try to answer in proper way :-) @ erkjetter About Behind Armour Effect: http://forum.militarium.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6437&start=15 from this post: to this: the meritum You have here: tbc
  9. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Dear friend. There are chrismas in Poland, and it's not good idea to write after 0,7L per head :) But, if user @erkjetter is interested in armour there is some polish forum when Im a moderator. Topics about passive armour: • Zaloguj reactive armour: • Zaloguj Absout...
  10. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    @methos. It's changed:
  11. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Again in Poland: http://www.10bkpanc.wp.mil.pl/pl/2_2683.html
  12. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Hundreds of troops in Nato training exercise in response to fears of Russian aggression in Ukraine - ITV News
  13. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Menwhile in internet is avaible part of the T-90S instruction. Export version. Some screens shots for indian friends -as T-90S users.
  14. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Menwhile in Poland: Russian invasion on Ukraina give first results on "est wall" :-)
  15. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    And another intersting think: ZTZ-99 module: and good quastion -what is diameter of road wheel or lenght of ERA casette? :) Sure - huge error, but... anyway - even including some error we can assume that special armour module in ZTZ-99 is not thicker then 650-670mm lookin at the wheel...
  16. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Hull: there is visible welding line when special armour cavity is ending. Frontplate is hard to see on those photo BUT it shoud be as I marked. More or less - circa 800mm for special armour + forntplate O.o Well Al Khalid-1 semms to be nice protcted tank: Turret: special armour module...
  17. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Results: of course there is some error, and backplate is not included - so there can be even 100-150mm armour AFTER those module. So module only: 670mm LOS + backplate (100-150mm) = 770mm up to ~800mm hull in progres but ist circa 800mm LOS so hull SHOULD be the same (at least this 770...
  18. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Guys I made a mistake - heavy one... @Dazller - you have absolutly right! 550mm armour module + circa 150-170mm backplate = 700 maybe 720mm LOS max sorry for very wrong previous measurment :/ my shamefull mistake acually
  19. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    Acually, Methos, Im not sure at all, while we have this erly prototype turre measured from museum: and here we have at least (for 0.) 660mm LOS + backplate so at least 700mm(!) then in case Type-96 whit modular armour whit screw on top modules I'm really confused: first - look on both...
  20. militarysta

    Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

    You wish. it was about 2500 and half of them was rebuild to Type-96A Type-99 is in circa 800 pieces and Type-99A2 circa 200
Top