Search results

I have no fer of invasion of an independent Tamil Nadu.

If Singapore, Malaysia, Sri Lanka (all with less population, resources oe economic strength than Tamil Nadu) can survive, why not Tamil Nadu or Maharashtra (for example)?

There is no Indianmp0erspective because there is no country, language or ethnicity common to the geographical area called India. The country caLLed India was created by west (UK) but for that there would never have been a India. The biigest mistake or injustice UK made was not to hold...

Chera dynasty was a Tamil dynasty. Tamil literature repeatedly refer to Chera, Chola, Pandya kings as Mooventhar (3 kings). No other kings were included.

No. Asokan turned back for whatever reason-real or imaginary. He never entered or ruled or overlorded Tamil Nadu

Asokan never rulee below Kalingam (part of modern day Orissa). He turned back at Kalingam as the arm,ies of the Tamil kings stood guard at the northern border

Cherans and Pandyans allied against Cholans in some wars. Learn history before posting.

You do not seem to know Tamil Nadu history.. Kerala did not exist as such in Asokan's time. It was part of Tamil Nadu in the Cheran kingdom. People spoke Tamil at that timne. Tamil Nadu never accepted Mauryan superiority. Tamil kings lined their armies against Asokan at the northern perimeteter...

Tamil Nadu existed as 3 kingdoms at least 2000 years ago of written history. The name "Tamil Nadu" is used in old literature.

Guptas never set foot in Tamil Nadu. According to the History of Cherans, they were turned back at the borders.

Not only foreign term it is the creation of foreigners.

Why C. N. Annadurai and Mu Karunabidhi are missing in tghis list of leading thinkers