Search results

Navy also having similar issues. P75I, LPD, MCMV, Fleet replenishment ship, NHS, etc FYI- MRTT tender terminated due to lack of funds, or too expensive for GoI, and GoI cancelled the deal, not IAF Better transfer these funds to IA, they can use it to buy more drones, missiles, rockets. Lets when...

Thanks for the info Q. INS Shankush equipped with harpoon missile or not ??

MoD signs a contract of Rs. 2725 Cr with Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd for Medium Refit with Life Certification of Submarine INS Shankush Posted On: 30 JUN 2023 4:37PM by PIB Delhi First thing came up in google

NO Vikramaditya means NO IAC IN can say GOOD BYE to Aircraft Carrier Operations This is how Russians/Ukraine work- they dump junk to those countries who want tech & support or ask more money without IPR

with booster. its normal speed around/below mach2.

Don't know, but I found

Tedbf production starts only after 2032, means vikrant 2 achieve foc only after 2035, & commission in 2032 if CSL starts works in 2024 and deal sign in 2023. IN can consider aew support from land basics to cbg. May be GoI considering vikrant iac2 in 2023 & rafale m in 2024.

AEW Helios or V22 AEW .

GoI brought P8i, with out any test, matter of fact, its still under development stage, even USN give ioc after GoI choose P8. from, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_P-8_Poseidon- ''The P-8's first flight was on 25 April 2009'' & ''In January 2008, Boeing proposed the P-8I, a customized export...

Q. why mig29k production line, why not mig 35k mki ? Major issue wrt Russian jets were its engine.

That's IN. Also not half baked, but experimental & P8I purchase is half baked. For IN, aircraft carrier is must, and only option available was Russian, with out mig & vikki, IN will loose aircraft carrier capability, and zero carrier for at least 3 decade. Now IA having 2 ACs, gained exp in...

what about on going ones ? iac2. mcmv uav Hospital Ship and other vessels P17b. chakra Q- list involves missiles ? by the thanks for the list Also there is no additional iac1 so far. and last time I read- goi/cds giving importance to ssk/ssn and asked[cds] how navy going to afford all these ...

IN have no economical issue so far. If you go back, CDS asked about naval planning, considering new CV[iac2], and articles about ssk vs iac2. So question still remains - who is going to pay for additional iac1 ? IA faced economical issues, they made some modification, now ok IAF comes with...

Chinese. Not irrelevant for Indian side

And how is going those far. IA stuck. IAF want to spend billions abroad and not giving enough importance local ones Only left is IN, and lacking minesweepers, lhd & hospital ship. Insisted of other AC[additional iac1| better focus on lhd, hospital ship, ssk with tot, and rest minesweepers...

Wrong answer. Q- who pays ? A- IN, once GoI agress. Rest plan/p18 etc not so important. So the real question is when Gol pays ? Here the important point - CSL don't depend on IN like other military dock yard, and can easy survive with out IN orders. Second point - 36 carrier jets, Sensors...

You missing the point, IN not only need additional ac but other stuff too, from helios,aircrafts, jets, support ships,ffg,ddg etc, multiple type of drones to sub, and new ones- ssn plus r&d. also e2d etc and who pays ? and how much ? Bottom line - iac1 need its mf star/missiles/aew/air craft...

its the vision and weak minded people that govern the system that is at fault for our failings. - agree Soon to be 5T economy is going to pay for that - waiting but -its the vision and weak minded people that govern the system that is at fault for our failings. IN going for iac2/ssk1/ssk2/ssn...

Big words man, but who is going to pay for those carriers ?? also when navy revise requirements in the midst of projects? yes now in p75i, inthe case IA, IAF they don't know what they want, so they always revise requirements in the midst of projects. Last time I read, it's iac2 vs ssk/ssn fom...

Two carriers 1. existing one 2. future one, both going to use EMALS & AAG and both are nuclear powered.