Search results

m88 only has 75kn of thrust. and very small compared to ge414 and 404. ej200 would have been best choice for tejas, it's far better non-afterburning thrust of 62kN and lower weight compared to ge414. although it has lesser reheat thrust.

can we please ban this fucking french guy from all indian threads he is just derailing all discussion with is rafale good rant

Porki got busted.................

to ham konsa gripen yaha BUILD karne vale he? same old screwdrive giri will happen if we buy the gripen... so stop supporting gripen as saab themselves don't BUILD over 70% of sub system of gripen... so your buying gripen would provide assistant to tejas program is laughable...

either they are testing tejas with uttam radar or its tejas mk1a

By looking at canard position i assume they are non moving... It will be huge panalty in AOA I guess...

Rather than blaming everyone why dont you look insight? Falseflagger

Its was succesfully tested on russian IL-76 test bed in 2010

He might be talking about older su-37 which was based on su-27m it was just prototype never reached production

Ignore that guy he looks like some low life guys who devote whole life to demote tejas on every forum... I jave see his str , asr blah blah but iaf had set max goal for fighter even lockheed martin wouldnt have been able to achive such asr , str but he constantly repeats same thing which shows...

then how mirage 2k is medium weight and participated in mrca competition:):hmm:??

the tejas mk1 we are talking about bhai not mk2 and mk2 already has 98kn engine, with 6.5 ton empty weight jets around the world how 85kn engine is under powered according to you and don't refer foolish asr again as it must be made by some dumb persons....

and by your assumption tejas stays lca ??? increase in empy weight automatically makes tejas medium weight we dont need your certificate..live in your dream land...

additional thrust to meet asr?? what how much more thrust you need for 6.5 ton aircrft? a 100kn engine will not be enough for you as you are anti tejas

i seriously doubt he is even indian

i smell tooo much burning man i can feel you bro.................

cmc tech is still not that mature to use in high pressure turbine blades so GE is just using extra cooling design in EPE engine

lol whats hot engine tech. he think we are illiterate? i guess he was saying "improved coolling system in HOT SECTION'' of GE-414EPE:frusty::facepalm:

i dont get it why ppl do lots of hallabol about tejas wight to thrust ratio and draggy air frame according to one gripen fanboy here its best aircraft for iaf but he dont/never mentioned about its drag and least thrust to weight ratio of gripen e/ gripen c why hypocrisy?? as per my knowledge...

looking at this i seriously doubt about capabilities of gripen and saab saab seems rouge company look at fake figures company show off to public thank god we r not buying this crap 80kn thrust and 5ton payload lol bullshit:bs: even out tejas doesn't have such payload with 84kn engine:mad2::mad2: