Search results

Now I see the real problem. :rofl:

Before, we talk about the existence or non-existence of God, it is needful to exactly know the concept of God. But that is a vast enough topic that demands a fresh thread.

Now that is an example of extremism in atheism.

A correction, not all religions. In actuality, the basic premise about reality can be correct in only one way.

Would this be the source good enough for you? Scientist: 'We didn't create life from scratch' - CNN

Time and again you make things personal, is that how "intellectuals" in your world behave?

I don't like that tone. If you want to discuss something, discuss on the basis of the merits of your arguments. As far organic compounds are concerned, they are already available. Like a crystal or a virus. A virus is not considered a living thing, if you know about that.

Artificial Hype...But Not Life...Created in MSM Laboratory | NewsBusters.org IT'S ALIVE!!! Visions of Dr. Frankenstein creating his monster came to mind with the news yesterday that artificial life had been "created" in the laboratory. Unfortunately, for the mainstream media hypemeisters, a...

IT'S ALIVE!!!Visions of Dr. Frankenstein creating his monster came to mind with the news yesterday that artificial life had been "created" in the laboratory. Unfortunately, for the mainstream media hypemeisters, a scientist has tossed cold water upon that bold assertion. And who was the killjoy...

Buh bye! :wave:

Let me tell you the basic facts about DNA/RNA. They contain structures that regulates the creation and maintenance of a body. They are not the source of life. If that were the case, Miller-Urey would have not much of a problem in developing a live creature out of non-living materials. Is that...

So we resort to personal nitpicking. Do you know what kinds of books I have read? What exactly can you tell me about life in biology books that I do not know?

When did I talked about religion's existence in context of amoeba? I was talking about the atheists taking the POV that we evolved from a single-celled creature. Now I am not sure whether you are at the level to proceed with this discussion. You need to first know the basics of the differences...

How is that? You mentioned a maxim as if it is known fact. Talk to me about it when they create life out of it. All because you have limited terminology, a baby cannot automatically fall into one or another category. Theism or Atheism happens when we are opinionated about the concept of...

Are we sure that we evolved from amoeba? I think you might be knowing that a cell is not considered a non-living thing. Another point being a human body forms over a period of nine months. The mating results in the basic "idea" of that body. An athiest is someone who does not believes in...

That is why I mentioned ethical limits. Industrialization with ethical limits may not have been for gratification, but that is not the case. Yet I believe, we do need industrialization. Because efficiency is required when demands exceeds productions of something and that is also directly related...

Animals and trees are still worshiped. But are they just animals and trees? You see if we have to resolve this debate, we will have to look into the very origin of our coming into being. How do you think we have evolved? Can anyone explain with preciseness that we have evolved from single-celled...

Let me clarify that I am neither against technology nor against industrialization. What I dislike is the fact that humans forget to employ what in Hindi or Sanskrit is called "maryada" - the ethical limit to something. At all times we need to revisit the ethical limits of all activities we...

Key thing is being close to nature, industrialization is for instant gratification and material greediness. The idea to satisfy one's senses through material pleasures have lead us to this path and it is irreversible in general, but that does not makes it appropriate for us to not contemplate...

What was the life expectancy in 500 BC?