Search results

Round structure sitting on the front is a compromise for the frontal stealth but f18 isn't the best bet to compare,just look at your own pictures of the f18s,conical radome(huge reflector of the microwaves),framed canopy and the stabilizers (which are not even aligned with the main wing body)...

She still doesn't have single piece canopy...

This one is the production variant right

At that smal range the whole aircraft is a source of reflection....you're putting an object of 20mts size just 150-200mts away against a 10kWpower...the whole RCS thing is based on detection at beyond visual range,and not in front of eyes ....

So all this point your perception on this whole mess was F22 and F35 can't be detected :facepalm: :bplease: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: ........comprehension skills is surely not your cup of tea :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Comprehension is surely not your cup of tea, you yourself use the sample of SAR image from the satellite to map a target sums up your state of mind :rofl: .....proving physics lol,in that graph show us which is the incident wave.....I'm sure you don't even know what single bouncing scattering...

You seriously need to work on the comprehension skills before jumping on any thing.....

Did I denied the presence of hypersonic missile in the Russian programs..No...Russia is manufacturing GaAs based electronics since 80s,infact it was the first to use GaAs in the radars after introducing the PESA radar...all of its electronics even today use GaAs...their development in GaN is not...

Such corner reflectors are used for the ground mapping,their is a difference bw Mapping and target search,in the mapping each returning wave's data is stored and then overlapped to present a picture,your other picture is the result of that,if you use the same technique for aerial target...

Did I even claimed that f35 carries a cruise missiles inside.. Based on what,it's not me but you people are claiming that Russian radars are based on GaN transistors,you yourself posted about GaAs based radars which is known to everyone....

*GaA aesa and still not operational even after 10-15 years of development...

That depends on who is claiming:bplease:

*Soon:facepalm:

Post when they are changed to the GaN...

The day it is spotted with the su57,prove the point then....

You're then proving your idiocy this whole time,your scientific data is used for the land mapping and helps well in the disastrous condition, specially helpful in flood and earthquake ,your whole argument was based on detection of the certain irrespective of the requirement,you tried so without...

Yes russians can produce 1000snds of cruise missiles why not 10000snds why they use dumb bombs in the whole spectrum of operations in syria,and yes I'm exciting to know how will they bear the cost of producing them in mass,a supersonic cruise missile costs around a million US dollars..... Go and...

Self praising is itself an idiocy,look for yourself what you're using to prove-->a satellite based imaging radar which paints static targets....can you do the same for the moving targets let alone the flyingone,possible only when you're using millimeter wave Radars,the kind of grade you're...

I guess they both will carry that externally...it's good thing that Su57 is actually integrated with Kh59M2

Cruise missiles/BM are less than 5 percent of inventory ,Russia itself in the syria has used dumb bombs against the cruise missiles..first the video was released much later,and that doesn't make an issue,the fact is they used a limited series prototype flown by the test pilots to the combat zone...