Search results

Another comedy.... How reliance and tata developed infrastructure without even wining a contract, moreover under SP the infrastructure is built by the jv with near equal participation(51: 49)....

Thats the best you can do to escape mockery, after been proven wrong for so many times... Ignorance level: -»infinite.....

Manufacturing is more important than integration for pvt companies and Indian industries, integrating parts supplied by foreign oems in india is more of a made in india stamp....

You keep on entertaining us... At least recheck what you state, chetak and chettah dont perform anything other than SAR, so you are now pushing that since chetak and cheetah perform only sar so navy should induct the replacement only to conduct sar, but the reality remains otherwise.... Chetak...

Alh was 45 percent indigenous on cost basis back some year ago, and thats too in a report by a gov body....

Hal made the biggest profit of their life in their last capital year

Tell you a fact, their are more pvt companies which are actually working with the psus than the one waiting for the lollipop..... Most of the today's start work with either psu or gov research organisation.

As far as i know HAL has started the outsourcing for the ALH ,industrial expansion is easier to do with HAL as they already outsource to various pvt vendors, and it wont have assemble in india tag..

Under IDDM provision, if a homegrown option is available, it is given priority over strategic partnership...

Go through brf article rather a dalla like shukla ji..... S76D has mtow 5. 5tons, same as ALH with higher empty weight.... Ofcourse naval alh will grow in weight...

That's why i called you to get out of your ignorance... Navy rfi says that the mtow should around 5tons, does cheetak/cheetah have that much mtow, rather they are used only when required the most...... Okay if this doent gets into your brain then leave it, does any of the contender expect the...

Lovely so it doesnt have automatic blade folding capability, neither the tail boom folding capability.....

Mk1 has do demonstrate landing and takeoff from a carrier .....which it will do in the coming months... Its a td for mk2.

If it has to be shore based then others are way better in payload and range.....

Wiki.... Has it demonstrated tail and rotor folding capability.

That shukla ji article came in 2008, when navy required around 250 helicopters to replace a cheetah, go and check the specifications of sikorsky76D and airbus s565 which are responding to the rfi, then you will know how wrong you are.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theprint.in/defence/private-players-cry-foul-as-hal-submits-2-bids-for-mega-navy-chopper-deal/229335/amp/ https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/hal-to-pitch-for-indian-naval-utility-helicopter-de-457911/...

So far only 3re foreign oems have responded. https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/tech-bids-for-first-big-make-in-india-project-opened-3-foreign-companies-in-fray/amp_articleshow/69643257.cms

My thinking was that 4blades are required to be folded. Thanks for correcting that...

Hal wants to kill mod, pvt firms and foreign firms....... More comedy coming.