Search results

They claim it's EMAL, actually It's a CATOBAR

during Indo Pak war 1971 ..this R 11 used the Steam catapult to launch fighters, after the arrival of supersonic Harrier, it was changed into angled deck https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:INS_Vikrant_(R11)_launches_an_Alize_aircraft_during_Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971.jpg

US wants to keep big number of fighter jets in one floating base which can able to launch more number of fighters in very less time, and wants the carrier safe from enemy AShM range.. Marines and Navy too had small LHD's which can launch F 35 B and AV 8B

The ship must have two EMALS, if one fails, other can ..Ford has four

actually it's not work like that, It's very hard to monitor a moving target with satellite 24x7

and you peoples still thinks, America strike their enemy after enemy fired a shot..

They were discussing about the large carrier matter since decades, also Carriers won't sail alone, and you can't even know there is a carrier sailing nearby or not, Our Vishal sized same like Charles de Gaulle, not a gigantic Ford size

Indian navy already learned well the Steam catapult's by using the R 11, now it's time for more modern more capable EMALS You think our Navy can't able to handle the EMAL

Also the follow on Arihant's are doubler the size than ATV Arihant, and we know few of them already in construction..I sure they pack more than some 120 MW reactor inside it

From Ajai Shukla's article ..............................................................................

Can you please name few fighters which can operate by using EMALS

Deviant art has had too many carrier design picture's, this one has Angled deck, our's will be flat one, our looks like below ..2nd one The nuclear decision was confirmed just hours ago, while it's easy to speculate IAC 2 must have Nuke propulsion

Navy’s second home-built carrier will be nuclear, but will come only in 2030s The navy has made its choices. When INS Vishal, the Indian Navy’s second indigenous aircraft carrier enters service, it will be a technologically cutting edge warship, on par with the world’s most advanced carriers...

Sir this bullshit rbth website repeating the same again and again Few examples 1. Fighted for Tu 22 - 4 additional P8 signed 2. Fighteing for BMP 3 - Our FICV project is happening well 3. Fighting for IAC 2 - Carrier development group had successfully finished 2nd meeting

I think that's media magic .. mostly DRDO chief says Tejas MK 1 A, media changed it into MK 2 Quite interesting .. he has many good options to report authenticate info's, quite few in today's journo ever heard the famous strat post round table discussion. this from 2014

. Amrika did a plane that carry a GAU 8 India making a plane that can carry pair of modified ameriki Indian Engine - AMCA

. @Gessler look at some report and analysis from Saurabh Joshi http://www.stratpost.com/fighters-for-the-iaf-creating-paths-to-a-dead-end some love his views..some may not http://www.stratpost.com/light-combat-aircraft-need-for-course-correction-i...

I heard the Tejas MK 2 program silently cancelled, and ADA continue works on MK 1 A to make it superior platform. Instead of going for MK 2 ..IAF thinks AMCA is better, Still Navy only left who plans for MK 2 Sourabh Joshi is the source

Nope .. You already did it .. thanks for the good video ..It's an awesome flypast

upload it into You Tube and share the link here ..