Search results

Not to mention that those Tejas were IOC standard. Come the FOC versions Tejas will carry a diverse range of a2g weapons and have more refined control laws for more accurate weapon delivery.

.................................................................................

That HARPING is in a context. ............

Further down from the same post you quoted. " The fact remains that Tejas is an evolving platform which is already much more than what it was originally conceived to become."

He 'The French' is a cheap shot taker. So I did not reply to him in point to point manner. The LCA program was conceived with only two things in mind. a) Creation of an ecosystem for the development of military aircraft in particular and rest of the aircrafts in general in India. b) Mig-21...

Like i care if you or won't you.:pound:

Yeah just like Tejas, above said products are doing what they are meant to do.

Point to point rebuttal would be such a waste of time. I have seen many like you in my 15 years of tracking Tejas. The Pot-Shot takers. o_O Like i said before you know nothing about LCA Program and Tejas. Especially about the composite reason why it was launched in the first place and how it...

"Easily the best aircraft I’ve flown,’ says pilot on Tejas" The Commanding Officer of the India Air Force squadron ‘Flying Daggers 45’, Madhav Rangachari...

Then i must say you know nothing about Tejas............End of the story.

Where in it, date of full sanctioning of LCA project is mentioned? Regardless, selection Wikipedia as a source??????? Well nothing more to say.

@BON PLAN This article should clear your misconceptions about LCA & Tejas timelines. https://english.manoramaonline.com/news/nation/2019/03/25/tejas-flies-on-l-and-t-wings-hal-ioc-fighter.html?fbclid=IwAR04EtnbaHq2lkmhoInZJf09XHiV450tWmiy4VYZhAD7ehsZtGIeasAs6Is

In first quote you replied that changing to smokeless propulsion meant the original plan failed. And very next quote you want to question the requirement of Smokeless propulsion? Oxymoronic and a case of cluelessness about context and the topic. And the context is?

Problem is more complex then it can be simply put. Regardless we are catching with the rest and best. That's what matters. Astra-1 is just one example.

Do you know that Astra-1 had to undergo the change in the chemistry of its propellant to smokeless and design of motor accordingly when the project was nearing completion? Should I mention that even advance missile like MICA does not have smokeless propulsion? What people fail to acknowledge...

IAFalready has RCS and ESM readings of JF-17. So what else they have to hide? We know everything needed to know about Bandar. Fact is Pakis don't want to get JF-17 equated with Tejas because it will prove the Bandar a clear loser. Face to Face you are either a loser or winner. Pakis know...

In netcentric warfare, Tejas would have the support of SU-30MKI as a powerful jammer. A luxury that JF-17 don't have and won't have.

A 'fact' as per some motivated articles, written without any logic or holistic sense of things? When the TD phase is not over design can't be frozen? It's a logically stated fact. LCA TD phase was to prove many new technologies like FBW, composite material airframe etc. When LCA TD-1&2 proved...

Ask Pakis about proof of F-16 or what they like to say ".................not F-16 but JF-17" shooting down Wing Co, Abhinandan's Mig-21. Funny, all the time Pakis were asking for proof and we were looking here and there. No one actually returned the favor by asking: Was Mig21 actually shot...

So how many of JF-17 will survive a Meteor shot from Rafale? Which aircraft in PAF inventory can support JF-17 in a full data linked air engagement like Su-30mki and Rafale would support Tejas?