Search results

Ha-ha that was with key cost data not supplied

This being a g2g deal da delegates are not required to be in India Only french ambassador or french govt representative are required to negotiate

It is foolish to say french have reduced their price They have not They removed deal component with price reduction I.e. 10b dollars for 36 rafales + weapons + infra + training + 10 yrs maintainance Then 9b dollars for 36 rafales + training+ 5 yr maintainance S for price reduction of 1...

Unfortunately W are talking about config & capability at time of induction What was capability o mig21 & mirage at the time of their induction I. Iaf Tejas hs much more capability than any other fighter at the time of its induction in iaf

Unfortunately what us acceptable to iaf for your I imported products is not acceptable I n case of domestic products Just a few months ago iaf was not willing to induct tejas without aesa

Ni if a radar can't track then how can it lock on if it can't lock on then how can it fire at full range of aamram ?

Well ^^^ guys burnol moment for you

As expected none of the rafale lobby even so called Indians like @Gessler @abingdonboy to name a few Have spoken a single good word about tejas &this moment of its maiden sqdn formation Mind you @Gessler is a person who who goes all gaga &oh &ah even if eric happier so as farts

If you look up my post where your originL post mentioning that is contained Also seems you have deleted your original posts Ha-ha

If that is indeed the case then Why is dasault offering annual.maintainace contract for 36 rafale deal @ 5% of capital costs per annum ? If the above is true it should come in a lot cheaper The HAL / Russian combi is offering at the same for su30

The key word here is developing mica with 60 km range So now yourself have admitted that current mica don't have 60 km range And the mica with 60 km range is being developed

Soon ,............,.... ...............,...........................

Come on Monday Take your 36 biscuits and go away ( if you can get them )

Unfortunately looks of rafale didn't help in its performance nor its sales

OK so tell tell what was the cutting edge western tank at the time you claim Patton was non cutting edge

So are you admitting that Russia had better cutting edge weapons far ahead of the western nations ?

Just think if it was so formidable with all the flaws you are putting here Then it would have run over Europe and France with the shortfalls you pointed out addressed

Range > 100 km nice Now let's discuss details At what altitude and in what mode ( head on or tail chase mode ?)

I.e.when rafale is in clean config and only the frontal sector RCS What about fully loaded and side profile RCS ?

OK for Russian radar range you claim doubts over mfg data I.e. mfg data not reliable But for meteor you are saying mfg data is OK I.e. mfg data is more than reliable Wow