Search results

The Kushan emperor Kanishka is on the poll :)

Thats why I'm asking you guys :dude:

Kashmir Information Network (KIN): A Paradise Turned into Hell

I'm not sure if this is 100% true, but its relevant. Kashmir Information Network (KIN): A Paradise Turned into Hell Something similar happened with Netaji Palkar -- @civfanatic @Bhoja @Singh Do you know if this is true ?

As I have mentioned on the previous page, someone created 7 new accounts to vote for RRC. I have now subtracted 7 from RRC's total

It will be kept private, however if member continues then it will lead to a permanent ban

It has come to our notice that a member has created 7 new user accounts simply to vote for a particular option in the poll.

No more discussions on a member's identity beyond this point

Reformatting and editing...... IMO the Dravidian movement guys went overboard from the usual anti-caste stance and the movement acquired a anti North Indian, anti Hindu character. I think Phenom's post nailed it Use of Dravidian is funny 'cause "Dravida" is a Sanskrit word :troll:

They promoted Brahminical culture and had Hinduism as the state religion. PS: any sources for the fish folk origin ?

Here is the "Dravidian" Chola using an "Aryan" script in their coinage File:Rajendra coin.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia From Wiki: :lol: So Periyar should have stopped using the term "Dravidian" since it came from Sanskrit :rolleyes:

Dravidstan emerged from an engineered racial and cultural hatred of everything that is north of AP and Karantaka. Good thing is that no one gave a crap to it Periyar E. V. Ramasamy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How is this separatist since he's advocating it for all of India ? That's just being anti Brahminism (also, he refers to Brahminism and not any imagined race)

But Ambedkar never endorsed a Dalitstan. I've read a lot a writings of Ambedkar, they were never racial in nature, nor were they blatant hate speech or separatist. He didn't manufacture history and racial identities Maybe that's why he has a pan india appeal, Periyar practically hated the rest...

I think a discussion started on these lines when Ambedkar and Periyar were said to be the same. I just disagreed with that fact. I would agree with Rahul M, Periyar seemed to have a lot of characteristics common with Jinnah. He engineered a new racial identity, said people belonged to different...

I said South Indian Dalit. Periyar implied that Hanuman being a monkey was to mock the Dalits. Hanuman being devoted to Ram was to shown the submissiveness of Dravidians to Aryans (or something like that) :lol: When did I ever say that Ramayan was true ? Infact it's the atheist Periyar who...

Okay Ironically, Chandragupta took up Jainism at the later stages of his life ;) Not even Ashoka ?

Cmon man ! Periyar came up with all kinds of crazy racial theories, stuff like Hanuman was a South Indian dalit and assumed everything is a conspiracy by the Aryan Race ! Ambedkar on the other hand was a extremely intelligent and rational person

You're joking right ?

Adux aren't Purans Bhrahminical texts ? Isn't this a contradiction Also from the links you gave i.e he's referred as lower caste in Buddhist/Jain texts and not simply folklore ! Bhrahminical texts infact would want to list him as a Kshatriya