Search results

State your points in a single post , and then I can understand, thread is too littered with all of you bickering

Please refrain from off topic discussion

You cover the engine , not downgrade the engine

What's about hope in it , whether the calculation about twr are right or wrong , whether your flying wing generate enough light or not , that's it

Even 35 kn is good enough to make it fly , our engine will make sure it fly near supersonic

Read about cooling of tungsten and it's fluidity , and whether it will allow those micro veins for cooling

Grain boundary formation

Bomber ucav .

Ghatak ????

About what ? And no i don't believe in expected timeline till it goes on production line ,it can be fast tracked or delayed depending upon the circumstances

Retrofit ??? Nope

I mean do you have 2020 brouchre

2020 brochure ?

Assumption ?? It is basic maths , amca aerodynamics is given more preference in designing than its stealth characteristics , so obviously it would require less thrust for similar aerodynamics performance to that of f 22 , which is the unchallenged maneuverable king , hace 29.5 t gross weight ...

Koreans are calling kfx as 4.5 gen because it lacks iwb , lot of antenna aren't conformal , irst in place of conformal DAS , no EOTS , plus engine . Not just because of engine . And you won't go mach 1.6 plus with use of external hardpoints in a dogfight , and in stealth mission , dry thrust...

You know it because ? You read some op ed or you contacted scientists ?? Turks are designing tfx as a 21 meter long aircraft , not same for amca

Do french are going to send their naval Armada to russian waters ? Or Britishers deploying their air force in Ukraine ? Even though they are part of NATO , nope ? Why would you want a open condemnation from us ?

Check it's source . If it's idrw exclusive then it's a fake news

Yup , already we exceeded in this tech

Depends , if rukies allow