Search results

Why don't we just make something similiar to US Army SOCOM thing and also remove para sf from para units bullshit. It's clear that you need people who understand the concept and application of sf well enough to use them effectively. Our Vanilla commanders are not enough for this, we really need...

Better buy magnified sights and reflex sights too otherwise all these guns are as good as vintage AK. It's the sights and accessories where next advancement in firearms lie, atleast in our case so.

I think our units dress up like rag tag coz of old saying that you have to become like enemy to know them better just like paki atankvadi are ragtags, lol.....😆😆( pun intended for those unable to understand my intend). But seriously tho SGoperative dude you don't have to be so defensive about...

IAF MI17v5 were primary meant for logistics duties replacing older mi 8 and mi17-1s. They are same as your basic MI17v5 with addition of wire strike protection and engines tuned for hot and high altitude operations, not much. In 1999, no sp suite sensors on mi 17s for sure, Dhruvs were the first...

Armouring is for crew compartment, not troop compartment, that's why I mentioned the word troop and not crew. Sir, don't quote what ifs, that article is from 2015 and the intention to procure sp suites havent fructified yet, here comes 2022. Only way for mi 17s pilots to spot missile and trigger...

Please show MAWS,RWR,LWS on our Mi17s in service currently, also they don't have armouring of troop cabin of any kind. Exactly the reason we lost mi17 in Kargil war. Sir, please don't spread misinformation here. Ask HAL to make a version of dhruv for said role and they will happily make dhruv...

Sir there's g3 and then their is psg1, you will want to use PSG for sniper role right? although both are guns and have same ammo. Similarly the Helis we have are suboptimal for that role. And for god sake don't use Mi17s we have, they don't even have self protection suite as of now, if war is to...

The point being you implied that Garuds do all those ops in india which I stated earlier without any proof, just this exercise with Israelis being sole known proof that too in a joint exercise. Don't you think its dishonest of top brass to let Garuds take high risk Airmen rescue without proper...

Lol, those are Israelis Helis😆

Why do you play forces disrespecting victim card. Ask others if they share your view, all I said has been backed by proofs, yours well not so much. Just to be clear, Garuds don't even have custom Helis like pavehawk needed for Airmen rescue missions, any proof will be welcome. Again I am sorry...

Sir, you are a known ak203 simp (ask any other member) to the point of justifying without much grounds, and please do go back on your posts, you indeed said that it was apolitical in one of your replys. Emojis are not banned I guess:tongue2:, just don't name call other members in future unless...

Yeah sir, pfffff..... Disrespectful :rofl: , you sure can't take criticism do you?? Perhaps calling Garuds cool Bois can be called borderline disrespectful, perhaps, then again this notion is shared by many guys on the forum itself. On other statements I stand rock solid, give your reasoning to...

Sir why you being so defensive, calling sorry ass, low life and other craps, I hope you understand that in a civil discussion you don't name call others, please don't act like Pakis on tv panels. I seriously hope sir you are not Prod Indian army like guys on internet. Leaving that aside- - Sir...

It all boils down to few conclusions- - Generally SOF and Infantry guys are treated like second class against other services within army. - IA guys at decision level doesn't really understand the utility of various equipments present and used by other forces effectively all around the world...

My comment is about the whole Indian SOF units. Kashmir like situations(some commonality atleast) have been present at some point of time or ongoing in various parts of the world examples are Israel(Palestine issue), Russia(Chechen issue) and others. In all these areas, Security forces including...

Bro, it's quite simple- no standardization, no different special forces command like socom leading to sf being provided just a tad bit better weapon than regular infantry forget about most of the accessories, unit level purchases leading to zoo of equipments, lack of discipline enforcement. Well...

All good but what exactly are the roles of Garuds. Are they to secure own base, take control of enemy base, CSAR for pilots, forward air controller, CT ops ?? Or anything else. How many Garuds exactly and under which command for which front??