Search results

True that. But you have mentioned only one deal i.e. with US. As the article mentions, there are a dozen countries with whom India has signed deals for supply of nuclear fuel now.

I understand its a minor change in the existing facilities. But the scope of expansion & construction of new reactors cannot be performed if you don't have the surety that you have secured an unhindered supply of fuel for the next couple of decades.

Yes but the quantities were not enough to support all our reactors running at full capacity. Also, very less scope was left for future domestic reactor spread expansion.

Indo-US nuke deal helped fuel domestic power plants, gave India access to critical tech: Experts NEW DELHI: A decade after the historic Indo-US nuclear deal, experts said the pact did not lead to India setting up foreign-built reactors, but it helped fuel domestic power plants and give India...

Problem is, they only see India as a counter to China. They fail to see the benefits of co-operation with India. They have no interest in helping Indians to tackle terrorism.

I would like to add 1 more point that I think they will discuss. "China"

PM Modi to visit Washington later this year: 5 things he and US President Donald Trump may discuss Soon after US President Donald Trump on Monday called up Prime Minister Narendra Modi to congratulate him on the "state-level elections" — Assembly elections held in five states, of which Modi's...

India, US moving into 2016 with ambitious agenda: US envoy http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/india-us-moving-into-2016-with-ambitious-agenda-us-envoy_1840012.html Washington: Describing 2015 as a transformative year in US-India relations, US Ambassador to India Richard Verma has said they...