Search results

And now we have experienced engineers and scientists as well, courtesy of Tejas.

Sorry 🤣🤣 I was really off the mark lol

IWB??!! Is this a fan render or something official?

Vstol Jockey from strategic front was saying that carrier based fighters need to have a wing sweep of less than 50*, and therefore, NLCA design was bad. Your views on this? P.S.: I dont understand why, I'm a complete noob.

Which means...? For the benefit of us noobs..

Like many members have said above, AMCA is a land based fighter and reconfiguring it for deck based operations would affect its capability adversely. And not to mention, take a lot of time. The Navy is dead set, and invested (they are involved in the design), on the TEDBF. From what we have...

Based on the render, can you estimate the frontal RCS of the aircraft? Could you give a figure for TEDBF, considering the airframe will have a significant amount of composite, based on what we can see from Tejas series?

AMCA is not a carrier based fighter program. Most likely not going to be, either. Do you think that the Navy Chief is stupid to have expressed the support that he expressed to TEDBF?