Search results

This is already supplemented by other AK-308 with thumb operated fire selector and also, AKV-751 notice internal spring-mounted sliding dust cover (kinda from Saiga-12) on right side, and left side one is from Galil ACE of course, now if it only had ambidextrous fire selector etc... they are...

? heckin Desert Tech MDR ?! as i said in past i'd rather fight with INSAS than fuckin' MDR

my reaction to this information

compared to muh AK-12 hurr durr AK-203 (whatever we're getting) is much saner choice, it just lacked in terms of tactical fire selector and buttstock being same from AK-103 (i.e. solid pattern one that also folds on side, non-length-adjustable) now with recent pictures coming out they brought...

got adopted much much before muh soywars thing, saw action in '71 war too, it mainly happened because we were following brits in small arms and tactics - adopted 1A SLR - adopted revolvers, later browning hi-power pistol - adopted bren LMG - adopted MAG 58 MMG - adopted Sterling "9mm Carbine"...

It was good but not without flaws, one of them likely be a very fatal one as i mentioned here in past... but yeah it very well could've become our Daewoo K-2 like rifle here

footnote, kinda forgot to mention, so CAG report on 2007 era Amethi factory, mentions about manufacturing of CQB Carbines, hhmm i wonder if originally the factory was meant to manufacture those Zittara = Tavor X-95 fork for Indians, in various calibres (5.56x45mm, 5.56x30mm MINSAS etc) or some...

>joke more like a scam, no joke i mean just consider this, > OFB Korwa, Amethi was inaugurated in 2007 by *ahem* Amethi MP Rahul Gandhi himself, and as per official CAG report itself they were supposed to manufacture CQB carbines and other small arms there > Since 2008 at least there were...

oh they seem to have upgraded Trichy as well, since december 2021 era local exhibition by Thiruchirapilli Factory it was showcased like this and TriCa - Trichy Carbine, like this notice Galil style thumb operated fire selector is also integrated, something that i direly wished our AKs to...

Why you guys not getting Turkroach kopy of it, MBT-55? or better, Chinki kopy of same,

We sure can, it just hasn't happened due to *reasons involving socialism*

:bplease: 😏 reminder this is AK-12, and pics were taken in March,2021 by russian defense journo Alexander Sladkov Russia's current issue AK-12 itself is facing such QA issues at this very early stage of induction, cracking in furniture and even metal parts, rusting of muzzle, gas...

both have their own merits and demerits, milled receivers are generally more sturdy and makes an AK balance sligthly more well due to proper weight distribution so muzzle climb on it is somewhat easier to control, but since every receiver is made by cutting off material off a solid block (i.e...

sure why not bhaee all 7.62x39mm AKs are mostly compatible to each others, 5.45x39mm ones too, It's just 5.56x45mm NATO AKs where there isn't much standardisation and magazines among different 5.56 AKs (or derivatives) may or may not be compatible to each other.

Stamped sheet receiver only , russians have long stopped manufacturing milled receiver AKs. On the other side we have OFB Trichy that's practically copy of bulgarian milled receiver AKs; so yeah.

check this review of SAM7SF-94E i.e. civilian version of M5F41 (AR-M1 plus those newer Beryl-style rails on top)

additional note, Same AK-200 project became AK-400 when they added new gas block with a removable plug, replaced iron sight block etc and this SAME AK-103-3 WAS USED IN MAKING IT, MEET AK-400 (OR SAME AK-103-3 WITH UPPER MENTIONED REPLACED SECTIONS) THIS AK-400 BECAME WHAT WE KNOW AS...

Ghatak is no from my side, basically INSAS in 7.62x39mm configuration, but What is issues with TAR ? it is practically copy of AR-M1F41 of bulgarian fame... and this AK-103 is practically AK-74M in 7.62x39mm configuration plus some rails and stuff, in fact i'd suggest you to refer to something...

9x19mm version of X-95 is of Blowback type instead of Tavor's long stroke gas piston type.

Well our SF guys indeed used AR-18,but i don't have the pic anymore as it shows dead link. Originally it was posted by Shatrujeet where they mistakenly called it 'M16A1' i hope someone from shatrujeet would repost the image to make things clear @hammer head @Bornubus source -...