Search results

Well, I don't easily lose my context while in a debate. I'm quite sensitive about my image. You even know what a strawman argument is? If you think that you are making any little sense, within context and not giving stupid arguments just to continue discussion, jump off the nearest...

There is no timeline being mentioned. The problem is you are passing off unsolicited stupidity and responses which don't even remotely fit into context. You are basically giving strawman arguments just for the sake of replying than continuing discussion. Besides irritating hell out of the guy...

Well, are you drunk or got bored of your days on forum now? Indeed it was clear that we are discussing a topic of near future and not asking you to file a petition for India's UNSC membership. Then how do I interpret it? I assumed "big lotto ticket" as a chance of letting it grow rather than...

UNSC veto power is strictly the one in international military affairs but nothing more than that. Even existing stage would be a mild star of that and an Indian power bloc will be a reality in next 10-15 years. If India needed a ticket from UNSC to grow and survive, it wouldn't have dragged...

I'm not listing any cons but denouncing the illusion of "international representation and harmony" which is strictly limited to diplomatic dialogues. SAARC is a big "nothing" and this "new method" of getting UNSC in name of representation is used by Brazil in Latin America and South Africa in...

Germany is a second tier economic power which has enough issues and will face objections from UK, France, China and Russia. Not only already UK and France are sufficient to represent that region, Germany isn't either strong enough or a rising power to make its chances of getting seat better...

I hope this was just not an official venting from GoI and something is actually cooking. Anything substantial happens like a new UN charter is introduced to include India even if it fails in vote.

For how long will India be kept out of decision-making structures of UN: PM Modi at UNGA session

India set to be UNSC non-permanent member, says will bring ‘Five S’ approach to world

From above link: ......................................................

Pakistan among 55 nations to back India's candidature for UN Security Council for 2021-22 Kya hai ye????

India, Germany, Brazil, Japan 'absolutely needed' at UNSC as permanent members: France

China refuses to back India's request to list JeM chief Masood Azhar as global terrorist by UN

India suggests voting to break UNSC reform deadlock Although, most likely nothing gonna happen.

I won't differentiate anyone here, matter here is with China these days feeling jihad in India has some sort of fair militancy or doing just for interest. They must get a dose of planes in buildings or a series of multiple blasts or at least a nice hostage drama from the gang of same Azhar they...

I'm yet to see them having own series of reactors or independent research programs. How far they have gone beyond only bombs in name of nuclear tech? I can't see them having simulator or shocker tunnels, making 90+ out of 94 defined missile techs, any sort of civil use reactor series, FBRS...

Initial case was regarding WMD which I don't guess could have sanctioned India to degrade it's arsenal. Regarding "Name 3 resolutions", three couldn't either be passed against India. Some can be challenged with varying meanings and others which have been brought. We already do, the way China...

This [redacted] many of its resolutions in front of your eyes. What ya did yourself except hiding behind this org like pussy? From targeting arsenals of specific countries to even the lows defending terrorists.

For few years only.................

Read it again. Actually, this is not even initially, India can start doing this from first day of joining council even after saying so!:biggrin2: How???? There is nothing called literally a "Veto" inside the UNSC rules. For passing a resolution, you need consensus of minimum number of member...