Search results

Lol no partition no Pakistan. What actually history books teach in Pakistan and Bangladesh?

I got what you are saying, St Thomas never came, I can prove that. But Syriac Christian Community is different. They came to escape persecution from other Christians led by Thomas of Canae, this Thomas and St. Thomas are different. But I am very happy to know that you too know St Thomas did not...

you misunderstood. Buddhism is an Indian religion, it's sacred language is Pali. Pali evolved from Sanskrit. Buddhism is like a sister faith of Hinduism where ideas of reincarnation, moksha, soul, Dharma are emphasized upon. Also never 75% of Indians were Buddhists. Despite its massive growth...

No they are not. Syriac Christians dont use Indian names, names like Josheph, Matthew that they commonly use are not of Indian origin, they dont revere Sanskrit, they dont worship Hindu Gods or follow any Indian faith. What you said was partially true, before Portuguese came. After Portuguese...

Those Indians dont support US over India. We are all westernized, yet we support India over US. Pakistanis Hindus that's why are different. They became Pakistani from Indian because without plebiscite India was partitioned because of religion.

Syriac Christians the oldest Christian Community in India who came in 345 CE is not absorbed still, and you talk about integration. Integration with exclusive religions is not possible. Shakas, Hunas their religion was pluralistic like Hinduism, that's why it was possible with integration, but...

Even B.R. Ambedkar wanted this. Is not it ironic that despite being officially secular, Kashmir owing to religious reasons still burns?

Pakistan was and got exactly what areas were Muslim majority. The Indian Muslims you see may be they were not Muhajirs or Punjabi. Pakistan and India both were created on basis of religion. Pakistan itself is a diverse country. You dont find similarity with a South Indian Muslim for that precise...